Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vgbelr$14lgg$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal. Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:34:51 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: <vgbelr$14lgg$1@dont-email.me> References: <vfrvbu$1pcpr$1@dont-email.me> <vfrvtc$1pfke$1@dont-email.me> <vfs2l7$1psvq$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 22:34:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="378c38e06e16354dd21fe40aa888c6ab"; logging-data="1201680"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189NQ1C2X9XdUoYLAEJWQDpgCjaNmr1Wl8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:D4cOzr5MPx0fyqI1gUT9wk5+cFg= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <vfs2l7$1psvq$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2173 On 30/10/2024 01:37, Cryptoengineer wrote: > I'd like to see some numbers on this. > > Yes, burning methane generates less CO2 per BTU than > methane. > > But: > > A significant amount of methane escapes the system in leaks > and gets into the atmosphere without being burnt. In the US, > about 1.4%. Other countries do much worse, and a recent satellite > has started mapping the problem: > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/nasa-s-methane-satellite-just- > mapped-its-first-plumes/ar-AA1spd3X?ocid=BingNewsSerp > > Coal that 'leaks' out of the system just sits on the ground. > > AND > > Methane, molecule for molecule, is a far more potent greenhouse > gas than CO2. 120x as potent, in fact. > > This is mitigated by the fact that methane only lasts about 10 > years in the atmosphere, while CO2 lasts far longer. > > https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials > > So, I'd like to see some actual numbers to support of debunk this > claim, not a simple declaration. I understand that methane in the sky is slowly converted to CO2.