Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgbelr$14lgg$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: AGW. LNG Worse Than Coal.
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:34:51 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vgbelr$14lgg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfrvbu$1pcpr$1@dont-email.me> <vfrvtc$1pfke$1@dont-email.me>
 <vfs2l7$1psvq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 22:34:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="378c38e06e16354dd21fe40aa888c6ab";
	logging-data="1201680"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189NQ1C2X9XdUoYLAEJWQDpgCjaNmr1Wl8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:D4cOzr5MPx0fyqI1gUT9wk5+cFg=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vfs2l7$1psvq$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2173

On 30/10/2024 01:37, Cryptoengineer wrote:
> I'd like to see some numbers on this.
> 
> Yes, burning methane generates less CO2 per BTU than
> methane.
> 
> But:
> 
> A significant amount of methane escapes the system in leaks
> and gets into the atmosphere without being burnt. In the US,
> about 1.4%. Other countries do much worse, and a recent satellite
> has started mapping the problem:
> 
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/nasa-s-methane-satellite-just- 
> mapped-its-first-plumes/ar-AA1spd3X?ocid=BingNewsSerp
> 
> Coal that 'leaks' out of the system just sits on the ground.
> 
> AND
> 
> Methane, molecule for molecule, is a far more potent greenhouse
> gas than CO2. 120x as potent, in fact.
> 
> This is mitigated by the fact that methane only  lasts about 10
> years in the atmosphere, while CO2 lasts far longer.
> 
> https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials
> 
> So, I'd like to see some actual numbers to support of debunk this
> claim, not a simple declaration.

I understand that methane in the sky is slowly
converted to CO2.