Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vgcm06$1en9g$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:45:57 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <vgcm06$1en9g$1@dont-email.me> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me> <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de> <380a63a4ba5e4206504c27b06c9f2a4b6bf3c02d@i2pn2.org> <vgaua6$11df5$1@dont-email.me> <8671079a0207b0f016ab1455868167011f3e65be@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 09:45:59 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7bbbed7ddf844ed79a6f2d2ee2488c73"; logging-data="1531184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193Chdl0Mx9ZLp8ByTRMH7/uNYer9xj788=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WiE46dgYPGv8oMpGxmEFQCU5Dx4= In-Reply-To: <8671079a0207b0f016ab1455868167011f3e65be@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2320 On 05.11.2024 04:12, Richard Damon wrote: > On 11/4/24 11:55 AM, WM wrote: > Cantor showed how to count the Rationals in a countable infinity. No. Then the real axis would have measure zero. > > He showed that the Reals Could not be counted, not even a finite length > line of them. That is the nonsense believed by matheologians. He assumes a fixed set ℕ. But if Hilbert's hotel was real, then always a diagonal number could be enumerated by inserting it into the list at line no. 1. > >>>>> Therefore the >>>>> point has no nearest interval. >>>> >>>> That is an unfounded assertions and therefore not accepted. >>> >>> No, it is a PROVEN statement, therefor true. >> >> It is proven in an inconsistent theory. I describe the true mathematics. > > No, you describe I describe that a point between two finite intervals has two finite intervals around it. Even this simple conclusion must be denied by the believers in matheology. Regards, WM