Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgg0ic$25pcn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:04:44 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vgg0ic$25pcn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me> <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de> <vgb1fj$128tl$1@dont-email.me> <vgb2r6$11df6$3@dont-email.me> <vgcs35$1fq8n$1@dont-email.me> <vgfepg$22hhn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 16:04:45 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f08683d228596561c9eb1a8bc09afc7";
	logging-data="2286999"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1988BKTNUc0CYrQ8s9Fjb8x"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vi99lLctLEHBPck15vEVA6KT0qc=
Bytes: 2360

On 2024-11-06 10:01:21 +0000, WM said:

> On 06.11.2024 03:48, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 11/05/2024 02:29 AM, Mikko wrote:
> 
>>>> Geometry is only another language for the same thing.
>>> 
>>> Another language is an unnecessary complication that only reeasls
>>> an intent to deceive.
> 
> It is a clearer language.

No, what can be said about numbers can be stated at least as clearly
in the language of arithmetic.

>>> No, the meaning is clear. Of course, because some intevals overlap,
>>> you should have specified what exacly you mean by "nearer". But as
>>> ε shriks the overlappings disappear and the distance between any
>>> two intevals approaches the distance between their centers we may
>>> define distance between the intervals as the distance between their
>>> endpoints even wne ε > 0.
> 
> I leave ε = 1. No shrinking. Every point outside of the intervals is 
> nearer to an endpoint than to the contents.

This discussion started with message that clearly discussed limits when
ε approaches 0. The case ε = 1 was only about a specific unimportant
question.

-- 
Mikko