Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: Netnews: The Origin Story
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 11:04:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <vgi6sa$2kbem$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vgdo2q$1l4qm$1@dont-email.me> <87a5edtsrr.fsf@jemoni.to> <1r2lmw5.52vtyww92xsaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <87a5ech2f4.fsf@jemoni.to> <0d394330-f861-44f9-c1a9-409d98fde094@example.net> <vgg5h2$26hvt$1@dont-email.me> <6b63eca1-aa26-8156-b1b8-2d42b7b9d245@example.net> <vggo7n$29oi4$1@dont-email.me> <49397abc-27f6-d53b-8c1d-d623b5f24395@example.net>
Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 12:04:43 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="54c7ca3fa2bc35d05c5da502272c81e9";
	logging-data="2764246"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19o0eRoVLbI7lFlcNv/Foqg"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6gfb/jUG4qCqRkmH6XU+8X/tnIo=
Bytes: 3290

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote:
> 
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote:
>>>
>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>> This is the truth!  As a thought experiment I sometimes think 
>>>>> about how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr 
>>>>> of posts, and I don't think I would.
>>>>
>>>> Been there, seen that....  Circa 1995 (I forget which groups now) 
>>>> the text posting volume was so great in the few groups I was 
>>>> following that it was not possible to keep up.  I was always 
>>>> behind, and falling further behind each day.  Eventually the fall 
>>>> behind problem reached a point where I decided to just drop out.  
>>>> So I disappeared for a good ten years or so.  Of course, when I 
>>>> did return again, Usenet was a shadow of its former self as far as 
>>>> text posting rates go.
>>>>
>>>>> It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of 
>>>>> groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines.
>>>>
>>>> One did have to do both, and even so, the volume was impossible to 
>>>> keep up with if the group was at all active.
>>>
>>> This is an interesting problem. How is it solved in modern social media?
>>
>> If by "modern social media" you mean the likes of FB and its ilk, 
>> presumably by having "the algorithm" showing you stuff, and then you 
>> just doom scroll through the algorithm driven feed.  And if stuff 
>> does not get put on your feed, you are unaware of its existance.
>>
> 
> Ah, so probably just setting some keywords in my client and filter based 
> on those. Not a very satisfactory solution.

Except with "modern social media" you (the user) don't get to "just 
set[ting] some keywords" for the "algorithm".  The "algorithm" does it 
all for you by magic.  Which, unfortunately, leaves you at the mercy of 
the allmighty "algorithm" as to what you see, and provides a great 
opportunity for the "algorithm" to bias your world view into whatever 
its creators want your world view to be by selective showing or 
omission of various posts to your feed.