| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vgj9th$2q7c9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:02:41 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <vgj9th$2q7c9$1@dont-email.me> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me> <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me> <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <vgg5uq$25spe$4@dont-email.me> <vgglbf$297j4$2@dont-email.me> <vggvub$2au3c$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 22:02:43 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0717cb24f79abe485311c08787b6fcd4"; logging-data="2956681"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ZPUujv4BtGYHI6ikV2fuZBEsnXyGYkpw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:cGD0Xo+yGjpr8ozvNQz/dns/sNw= In-Reply-To: <vggvub$2au3c$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2261 On 11/6/2024 4:00 PM, Moebius wrote: > Am 06.11.2024 um 21:59 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: >> On 11/6/2024 8:36 AM, WM wrote: >>> On 05.11.2024 18:25, Jim Burns wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Instead, there are boundary points. >>>> For each x not.in the intervals, >>>> each open set Oₓ which holds x >>>> holds points in the intervals and >>>> points not.in the intervals. >>>> x is a boundary point. >>> >>> For every definable x we can decide whether it is inside the interval >>> including its endpoints or outside. No open intervals are necesseary >>> or useful. Your trick is cunning bot not accepted. >> >> For any z we can decide if its inside or outside of <whatever> > > Hint: In contrast to WM's psychomath we do not have to "decide" if a > number z is inside or outside of a certain interval. It IS EITHER inside > of the interval OR NOT. (No "decision" necessary.) > Indeed!