Article <vgklr9$gfh$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vgklr9$gfh$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<vgklr9$gfh$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!ereborbbs.duckdns.org!.POSTED.192.168.18.6!not-for-mail
From: Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: 'hobbit' generic/scientific term now that should be used
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:32:25 +0100
Organization: Erebor InterNetNews
Message-ID: <vgklr9$gfh$2@ereborbbs.duckdns.org>
References: <vg9rrn$3m880$4@dont-email.me>
 <e07qijlnejavqm3626sbog7f1l60jfhrit@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: c3066ed76bae8bcc0e476efb157ff758
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 09:32:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: ereborbbs.duckdns.org; posting-host="192.168.18.6";
	logging-data="16881"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ereborbbs.duckdns.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <e07qijlnejavqm3626sbog7f1l60jfhrit@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2341
Lines: 28

On 11/7/2024 9:01 PM, Zaghadka wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:07:35 -0000 (UTC), David Chmelik
> <dchmelik@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 'Hobbit' is a generic/scientific term now that should be used.  For over
>> 20 years, science refers to ancient small humans as 'hobbits', which might
>> even fit some current-day people.  So, Dungeons & Dragons should just re-
>> add the term.  Most/all my D&D groups used the term.
>>
>> Of course, D&D can't re-add terms 'balrog', 'ent', 'nazgul', etc., which
>> are in first edition, replaced in second edition (literary edition, not
>> ruleset edition, which didn't change).
> 
> "Troll" is the term I would apply to this.
> 
> There was no Balrog in 1e (it was a Type VI demon, ex: "Balor"), nor Ent
> (it was Treeant), nor Nazgul.
> 

I assume he meant ODnD, which is what I think he meant with the 
difference between literary and ruleset edition.

Thankfully there are nerds interested in everything (I am not precluding 
myself from being one) so someone made a blogpost listing all of the 
changes they did in that regard:
http://nerdlypleasures.blogspot.com/2022/02/removed-or-changed-references-to-jrr.html

They changed stuff starting from the 5th printing of Chainmail 3rd 
edition and the 6th printing of the Original Dungeons and Dragons Box Set.