Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---x86 code is a liar?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:22:22 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <vgmdge$3ecms$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vgc2ju$1bqmm$1@dont-email.me>
 <585823321cf0a5e579b855438cfbf93229b233ee@i2pn2.org>
 <vgdjdq$1jr80$1@dont-email.me>
 <b24e957b9f2af15c0ba7f18a3f7bfe2c6ff6419d@i2pn2.org>
 <vgegce$1phg2$1@dont-email.me>
 <e36afcb3758e0fb26d58019c08a24c6df0b562a7@i2pn2.org>
 <vgenp1$1uh1b$2@dont-email.me>
 <acecb0ba68d86b00c95fae1ecf690ec514aee26b@i2pn2.org>
 <vgfq86$24mon$1@dont-email.me>
 <e7a092c593ad1431a1bf6589d0102312545612ef@i2pn2.org>
 <vghb16$2ge1v$1@dont-email.me>
 <e51f21daadd358ef13801c918106c2fdc65a9f6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vghe3p$2gr3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <4cb98b3918d6745f53bb19582b59e786d4af5022@i2pn2.org>
 <vghgar$2h30o$1@dont-email.me>
 <e40629600e317dba47dd3d066d83899fa7b8a7ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vgiq1d$2nkqv$1@dont-email.me>
 <c7372fcf786ecb5e394cf44079e5ff126899e252@i2pn2.org>
 <vgk26b$31qrg$2@dont-email.me>
 <17a781f4479f0c8fb2c02d40a55e5cfa7a0f4847@i2pn2.org>
 <vgl967$37h38$7@dont-email.me>
 <78a3858469721b9c70c6672df4bf2c03e0492d70@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 02:22:22 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529658128fc1f19cc0ff32f79f31d785";
	logging-data="3617500"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+gwse4GdNoM2cVCII9wifa"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VA4zLXkMsVHIbhLiWH4/4UXu6mU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <78a3858469721b9c70c6672df4bf2c03e0492d70@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241108-10, 11/8/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3912

On 11/8/2024 11:01 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/8/24 10:02 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/8/2024 6:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 11/7/24 10:56 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 11/7/2024 9:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 11/7/24 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH has the property that DDD never reaches
>>>>>> its "return" instruction final halt state.
>>>>>
>>>>> But DDD emulated by HHH isn't an objective property of DDD.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No it isn't
>>>
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>>
> 
> No, you are, becuase you don't know know what the words mean.
> 
> The semantic property is the results of the COMPLETE emulation of the 
> input given to HHH, 

That you keep going back to the moronic idea of completely
emulating a non-terminating input makes you look quite stupid.

> not its partial emulation, and the complete 
> emulation is of the DDD using THAT HHH, the one that aborts and returns 
> the answer if that is the one you are claiming to be giving the right 
> answer.
> 
> Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity and ignorance.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer