Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a
 new basis ---x86 code is a liar?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:32:29 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <vgme3d$3egga$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vgdjdq$1jr80$1@dont-email.me>
 <b24e957b9f2af15c0ba7f18a3f7bfe2c6ff6419d@i2pn2.org>
 <vgegce$1phg2$1@dont-email.me>
 <e36afcb3758e0fb26d58019c08a24c6df0b562a7@i2pn2.org>
 <vgenp1$1uh1b$2@dont-email.me>
 <acecb0ba68d86b00c95fae1ecf690ec514aee26b@i2pn2.org>
 <vgfq86$24mon$1@dont-email.me>
 <e7a092c593ad1431a1bf6589d0102312545612ef@i2pn2.org>
 <vghb16$2ge1v$1@dont-email.me>
 <e51f21daadd358ef13801c918106c2fdc65a9f6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vghe3p$2gr3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <4cb98b3918d6745f53bb19582b59e786d4af5022@i2pn2.org>
 <vghgar$2h30o$1@dont-email.me>
 <e40629600e317dba47dd3d066d83899fa7b8a7ab@i2pn2.org>
 <vgiq1d$2nkqv$1@dont-email.me>
 <c7372fcf786ecb5e394cf44079e5ff126899e252@i2pn2.org>
 <vgk26b$31qrg$2@dont-email.me>
 <17a781f4479f0c8fb2c02d40a55e5cfa7a0f4847@i2pn2.org>
 <vgl967$37h38$7@dont-email.me>
 <78a3858469721b9c70c6672df4bf2c03e0492d70@i2pn2.org>
 <vgmdge$3ecms$1@dont-email.me>
 <f157303ea6a750b5c42878bb6464ddca0821526d@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 02:32:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529658128fc1f19cc0ff32f79f31d785";
	logging-data="3621386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ptLPwvg39dQ+3TyaSruTy"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mwgxvlJsIHK38L4qjypB8UshlyM=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <f157303ea6a750b5c42878bb6464ddca0821526d@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241108-10, 11/8/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 4791

On 11/8/2024 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/8/24 8:22 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/8/2024 11:01 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 11/8/24 10:02 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 11/8/2024 6:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 11/7/24 10:56 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/7/2024 9:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/7/24 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH has the property that DDD never reaches
>>>>>>>> its "return" instruction final halt state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But DDD emulated by HHH isn't an objective property of DDD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>> It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No it isn't
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, you are, becuase you don't know know what the words mean.
>>>
>>> The semantic property is the results of the COMPLETE emulation of the 
>>> input given to HHH, 
>>
>> That you keep going back to the moronic idea of completely
>> emulating a non-terminating input makes you look quite stupid.
> 
> Why do you say that?
> 
> It is the DEFINITION of a semantic property.
> 

*You yourself have already disagreed with that*

On 11/3/2024 12:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 11/3/24 9:39 AM, olcott wrote:
 >>
 >> The finite string input to HHH specifies that HHH
 >> MUST EMULATE ITSELF emulating DDD.
 >
 > Right, and it must CORRECTLY determine what an unbounded
 > emulation of that input would do, even if its own programming
 > only lets it emulate a part of that.
 >

> You are just proving your stupidity by judging things by your un- 
> informed and incorrect opinion rather than the definitions.
> 
> Sorry, you are just proving how utterly stupid you are and that you are 
> nothing but a pathological liar.
> 
>>
>>> not its partial emulation, and the complete emulation is of the DDD 
>>> using THAT HHH, the one that aborts and returns the answer if that is 
>>> the one you are claiming to be giving the right answer.
>>>
>>> Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity and ignorance.
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer