Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgn4gm$3lcor$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Final final 1kHz oscillator
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:54:46 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vgn4gm$3lcor$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vglt5t$30a3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:55:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78505003f26acfb61046862908a2f911";
	logging-data="3846939"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19UlGW42YsvZnEB7/9cgNo58TQ+Edj29ig="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GH4CIWe9hu7A9ZEbaHa+iLlfOT0=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vglt5t$30a3$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241109-0, 9/11/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 2356

On 9/11/2024 7:43 am, Edward Rawde wrote:
> This is the simplest circuit I can come up with.
> Harmonics are more than 80dB down in simulation.
> FFT the last 30 seconds.
> There is only one harmonic stopping me claiming 90dB but the exact FFT result can depend
> on exactly how much output is selected for the FFT. You may see different results.
> 
> If a prototype is ever built, attention to the type and quality of the capacitors used will be needed.
> Electrolytics are not intended. Put C1 and C2 near U1 supply pins.

If electrolytics are not intended, why are most of the capacitors rated 
at 10V?

When I cut and pasted the file the capacitors were mostly labelled as 
10?, 1? and - in the case of the wein bridge capacitors 0.015?

The 15nF capacitors are rated at 16V - the polypropylene parts you can 
actually buy that are offered with a +/-1% tolerance are 63V and 250V parts

I presume you intended u or the Greek mu symbol, and after I'd done that 
substitution the simulation did work, if not well.

The feedback loop doesn't settle well, and I suspect that I know why. R4 
should probably be in series with C3, not in parallel.  More later.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney
-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney