Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:45:05 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <vgni02$3osmc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me>
 <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me>
 <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <vgfgpo$22pcv$1@dont-email.me>
 <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <vgg57o$25ovs$2@dont-email.me>
 <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <vggh9v$27rg8$3@dont-email.me>
 <ff2c4d7c-33b4-4aad-a6b2-88799097b86b@att.net> <vghuoc$2j3sg$1@dont-email.me>
 <d79e791d-d670-4a5a-bd26-fdf72bcde6bc@att.net> <vgj4lk$2ova9$3@dont-email.me>
 <f154138e-4482-4267-9332-151e2fd9f1ba@att.net> <vgkoi7$b5pp$1@solani.org>
 <6d9f3b10-47ad-459c-9536-098ce91f514b@att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:45:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="61c0098f25fee3c5f34d41f8e7412679";
	logging-data="3961548"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18b/PVvPZr9akjAE3tIUZ3fpwDCDfHp3y4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:erdogmgKG3TDCiMAx5n1ow+vVoM=
In-Reply-To: <6d9f3b10-47ad-459c-9536-098ce91f514b@att.net>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2382

On 08.11.2024 19:01, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 11/8/2024 5:18 AM, WM wrote:

>> My understanding of mathematics and geometry
>> is that
>> reordering cannot increase the measure
>> (only reduce it by overlapping).
>> This is a basic axiom which
>> will certainly be agreed to by
>> everybody not conditioned by matheology.
> 
> By
> "everybody not conditioned by matheology"
> you mean
> "everybody who hasn't thought much about infinity"

Everybody who believes that the intervals
I(n) = [n - 1/10, n + 1/10]
could grow in length or number to cover the whole real axis is a fool or 
worse.

Regards, WM