Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vgni8n$3osmc$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:49:44 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <vgni8n$3osmc$3@dont-email.me> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vgab11$st52$3@dont-email.me> <ecffc7c0-05a2-42df-bf4c-8ae3c2f809d6@att.net> <vgb0ep$11df5$4@dont-email.me> <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <vgfgpo$22pcv$1@dont-email.me> <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <vgg57o$25ovs$2@dont-email.me> <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <vggh9v$27rg8$3@dont-email.me> <ff2c4d7c-33b4-4aad-a6b2-88799097b86b@att.net> <vghuoc$2j3sg$1@dont-email.me> <d79e791d-d670-4a5a-bd26-fdf72bcde6bc@att.net> <vgj4lk$2ova9$3@dont-email.me> <f154138e-4482-4267-9332-151e2fd9f1ba@att.net> <vgkoi7$b5pp$1@solani.org> <d780ead415ff3a62ccd9b606bcd743fea3d8002c@i2pn2.org> <vglf32$396r8$1@dont-email.me> <521668acd2ed6184f2f2e36f67fdb1bc3a997524@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 12:49:44 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="61c0098f25fee3c5f34d41f8e7412679"; logging-data="3961548"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194ATL26vxe7FYhVPMETH8bcI61vE1SViE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:TfmJhYcECvqsF7wc1Ls5qrNC2lk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <521668acd2ed6184f2f2e36f67fdb1bc3a997524@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 2323 On 08.11.2024 20:05, joes wrote: > Am Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:43:15 +0100 schrieb WM: >> I take it as evident that intervals of the measure 1/5 of the positive >> real axis will not, by any shuffling, cover the real axis completely, >> let alone infinitely often. I think who believes this is a deplorable >> fanatic if not a fool. > What is the measure you are using and what does it give for the real > axis? The measure is the density 1/5 for every finite segment and its limit 1/5. Regards, WM >