Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
Subject: Re: FAQ: Current Usenet spam thresholds and guidelines
Date: 10 Nov 2024 18:05:00 GMT
Organization: NOYB
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vgr04l.v10.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References: <spam-faq.20241110000202$1043@news.killfile.org> <20241110.011907.a5201502@mixmin.net> <vgpnvb$78j9$1@paganini.bofh.team> <qam1jj9jdiudd8313a9edp83tfl4t3ok51@news.usenet.ovh>
X-Trace: individual.net 04pR1RM0X/X2JQmMjRFpTQpd2r45rGCic2VCoBIspp0+xyy8Uc
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cynRssIFed/xQJm9sFVO1wtAwGo= sha256:Eb+thpSB6r91OqAqvPzpL17jiKQqFfFBenSGPii4AaE=
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Bytes: 1758

Jean-Paul <contact@usenet.ovh> wrote:
> Pluto <Pluto@fido.net> composa la prose suivante:
> 
> >D wrote:
> >> On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 00:02:02 +0000, tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
> >>> Archive-name: usenet/spam-faq
> >>> Posting-Frequency: weekly
> >>> Last-modified: 1998/11/10
> >>                  ^^^^ ^^ ^^
> >> ". . . while you're in hibernation . . . it's exactly like being asleep . . ."
> >
> >What is your problem?
> >This is a document which is posted weekly but has not been modified for 
> >26 years.  I'd consider "monthly" to be sufficient.
> >You have been posting pointless replies for over two months now, don't 
> >you have any other hobbies?  Or a life?
> 
> Yes, monthly is probably sufficient.
> But the current frequency is not a problem.

  And for those who think it's a problem: Your killfile is your friend!  :-)