Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vgrks6$kotn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: what is wrong with RF people?
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:58:46 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vgrks6$kotn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <obe2ij5bagvm5ols2bciu5p9t9o4v31p4v@4ax.com>
 <vfrp73$1oe8d$1@dont-email.me> <23r2ijpfaevgvkjpimisajni3mqdma9703@4ax.com>
 <vfugu4$2c778$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:58:47 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8bd358200a908477cbfce54cc665c7b1";
	logging-data="680887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189LP6II+7XgG+SU53B2nqY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PYLEep0iM5ygfpKH03mhhP2mWhc=
In-Reply-To: <vfugu4$2c778$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2274

On 10/30/2024 6:53 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:17:58 -0700, john larkin wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:56:34 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid
>> <martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote:
>>
>>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Wrote in message:r
>>>> https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/macom-technology-solutions/
> MASW-007107-TR3000/4429770Apparently
>>>> "DC" means 2 GHz to these people. They test it with 8 pFseries caps on
>>>> the input and output.I once used a Maxim part rated DC to 10 GHz, that
>>>> absolutely screwedup below 100 MHz.A lot of "DC" parts are actually
>>>> characterized down to 9 KHz, becauselots of spectrum analyzers only go
>>>> that low.Grrrrr.
>>>
>>> O yes,  they are different. No one would really understand,  until
>>> you work with one.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>
>> I found one Pericom RF switch that is "True DC to 8 GHz", which may be
>> an improvement.
>>
>> So DC means AC, but "True DC" means DC in the RF world.
> 
> ISTR being told here that 40Mhz was "practically DC" (but I suppose today
> it probably is!)

I thought it might be 100MHz. After all, the wavelength is almost 10 
feet long!