Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vgrks6$kotn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: what is wrong with RF people? Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 18:58:46 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vgrks6$kotn$1@dont-email.me> References: <obe2ij5bagvm5ols2bciu5p9t9o4v31p4v@4ax.com> <vfrp73$1oe8d$1@dont-email.me> <23r2ijpfaevgvkjpimisajni3mqdma9703@4ax.com> <vfugu4$2c778$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:58:47 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8bd358200a908477cbfce54cc665c7b1"; logging-data="680887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189LP6II+7XgG+SU53B2nqY" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PYLEep0iM5ygfpKH03mhhP2mWhc= In-Reply-To: <vfugu4$2c778$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2274 On 10/30/2024 6:53 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 16:17:58 -0700, john larkin wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:56:34 -0400 (EDT), Martin Rid >> <martin_riddle@verison.net> wrote: >> >>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Wrote in message:r >>>> https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/macom-technology-solutions/ > MASW-007107-TR3000/4429770Apparently >>>> "DC" means 2 GHz to these people. They test it with 8 pFseries caps on >>>> the input and output.I once used a Maxim part rated DC to 10 GHz, that >>>> absolutely screwedup below 100 MHz.A lot of "DC" parts are actually >>>> characterized down to 9 KHz, becauselots of spectrum analyzers only go >>>> that low.Grrrrr. >>> >>> O yes, they are different. No one would really understand, until >>> you work with one. >>> >>> Cheers >> >> I found one Pericom RF switch that is "True DC to 8 GHz", which may be >> an improvement. >> >> So DC means AC, but "True DC" means DC in the RF world. > > ISTR being told here that 40Mhz was "practically DC" (but I suppose today > it probably is!) I thought it might be 100MHz. After all, the wavelength is almost 10 feet long!