Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: Why does getppid() still return old parent pid after setsid()?
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:57:23 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <vgtr3i$15srv$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vgl8h1$385vs$1@dont-email.me> <vgn9q2$8mls$1@news.xmission.com>
	<vgsko5$u7pg$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:57:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13b7eac62ff6457352a541d5a235d1e2";
	logging-data="1241983"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+n399nm56/dGasTzKxva25"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v/Oih/wGC5hAqulhPvrd+fUHBYw=
Bytes: 1207

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:02:45 -0000 (UTC), Muttley wrote:

> can't help thinking they should be a single shot OS call to completely
> seperate the child from parent.

I guess it’s not that important.