Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: So =?UTF-8?B?SG934oCZcw==?= Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:59:40 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <vgtr7r$15srv$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vgpjhs$8iev$2@dont-email.me>
	<kCSdndu98PilSq36nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<vgr7n6$iihl$1@dont-email.me> <6r92jj9p9b00e603grskrf2lcq462fecjc@4ax.com>
	<vgrdri$jlck$1@dont-email.me> <q3f2jj9q2fojqrk5km2m0lrs4igsmfprnq@4ax.com>
	<vgrev4$jlck$7@dont-email.me> <vgtan9$12joq$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:59:40 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13b7eac62ff6457352a541d5a235d1e2";
	logging-data="1241983"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+a7VCnzGJRqdpJP/1uPq6T"
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OcbxgvokgeXbD0qKkzpgNL2EfFw=
Bytes: 1645

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:17:52 -0500, DFS wrote:

> On 11/10/2024 6:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> Look, we are agreed that x86 is a dead end. 
> 
> ... agreeing with each other about something irrational?

Even Microsoft agrees x86 is a dead end. Otherwise, why is it putting so 
much (futile) effort into Windows-on-ARM?

Actually Windows-on-Qualcomm-ARM, which is why it’s futile.