| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vgtslt$16754$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 21:24:14 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <vgtslt$16754$1@dont-email.me> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uusur7$2hm6p$1@dont-email.me> <vdf096$2c9hb$8@dont-email.me> <87a5fdj7f2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve83q2$33dfe$1@dont-email.me> <vgsbrv$sko5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 22:24:14 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13b7eac62ff6457352a541d5a235d1e2"; logging-data="1252516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Z6mj1+G0aAZKlcTMshNqF" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+T0OEEQ/JUEHYCnj9BGN5I8QhAA= Bytes: 1936 On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 07:31:13 -0000 (UTC), Sebastian wrote: > In comp.unix.programmer Muttley@dastartdlyhq.org wrote: > >> [Perl’s] syntax is also a horrific mess. Larry took the worst parts of >> C and shell syntax and mashed them together. > > I think you've identified the one language that Python is better than. In terms of the modern era of high-level programming, Perl was the breakthrough language. Before Perl, BASIC was considered to be an example of a language with “good” string handling. After Perl, BASIC looked old and clunky indeed. Perl was the language that made regular expressions sexy. Because it made them easy to use.