Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: USA Election
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:20:35 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <vh2221$2641e$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vgccus$2et7$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vgm4ks$3cr8r$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ot3vjr7s0auq000@post.eweka.nl> <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgovie$qo0$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0ot5ax098gnll003@post.eweka.nl>
 <vgr3re$h92v$6@dont-email.me> <vgsjps$u21i$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgtlu8$14tf6$1@dont-email.me> <vgve16$1iii2$2@dont-email.me>
 <vh09o3$1nvis$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:20:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1839b607ea9351a23a28175a3da98164";
	logging-data="2297902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+53BchR5ZFxFyPqlrSD9emfqZAQdgO5S8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OUeMFZ7n6jBcfBLcED9+P3snnug=
In-Reply-To: <vh09o3$1nvis$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3422

The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
> On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
>>> On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
>>>>> On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <Snip>
>>>> 
>>>>>> Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
>>>>>> against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
>>>>>> after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
>>>>>> seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
>>>>> just like over 10 million other people including myself.
>>>>> Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
>>>>> believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
>>>>> exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
>>>>> letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
>>>> 
>>>> When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
>>>> thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
>>>> bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
>>>> I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
>>> 
>>> The latter.
>>>> 
>>>> Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
>>> 
>> So no responce to my second situation/question??
> 
> You didn't provide any choice.

When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
"This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
happens??"

> From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
> its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia

One on the co-travellers. Whoopee!!

> I thought it going to be crap, and so it was, especially when 
> Whittaker appeared.
> 
> The majority of viewers though exactly the same way as by the end of
> the first series the viewership had more than halved and by the end
> of Whittaker's run she had lost 3/4 of the viewers.
-- 
Daniel