Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vh2pse$4j5e$11@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Coogan's Bluff <ft.tryon@park.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_OT:_=22I'm_Worried_About_Graham=22._=f0=9f=99=8f?=
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:04:38 -0700
Message-ID: <vh2pse$4j5e$11@solani.org>
References: <082fddde4a2b233938e15b0969e235ca@www.novabbs.org>
 <ea05d6bed9418d36980cb05fec4d12dd@www.novabbs.com>
 <vgjqri$2r6fl$8@dont-email.me>
 <80a996b2fb2f3e64ef3be19363117f4b@www.novabbs.org>
 <vgjsd2$2tg39$1@dont-email.me>
 <c5b478a5d76b74de08cebcd1b05255d8@www.novabbs.org>
 <lp87kbFtmq1U7@mid.individual.net>
 <370762c61cda1aeaa6807f4329e9f81d@www.novabbs.org>
 <lpg8cgF7iv1U2@mid.individual.net>
 <6732ee1c$2$3831$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <lpgaoiF7iv1U5@mid.individual.net>
 <07e929da-ac92-f92e-fa69-9f0331bc5baf@example.net>
 <6734d488$11$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:07:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="150702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aM8rB2G2k+oQGh3eL61VeMOtZwc=
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLDRAeOS0M/xJ2R3V4hznduFwkrsrCiv1OS4xMmukq0FopRfXYzu4hj9nN75XvG/8CFz8y4RUF
In-Reply-To: <6734d488$11$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 2328
Lines: 20

Mike Duffy wrote:
> On 2024-11-12, D wrote:
> 
>> Would it be possible to change the law that says that
>> the president has to be born in the US?
>> Is it impossible, or a court decision away,
>> or would it be a decade long process?
> 
> It requires an amendment to the constitution. But then
> others would try to squeeze in amendments about firearms
> and the electoral college &c at the same time and it
> would get mired in partisan politics.
> 
> Over 10,000 proposals for amendments have been rejected,
> and the last amendment (#27) was ratified 32 years ago and
> took 203 years to go from a proposal to ratification.
> 
> So I would not bet any money an any changes real soon.
> 

Surprisingly unbiased analysis there.