Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vh2pse$4j5e$11@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Coogan's Bluff <ft.tryon@park.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_OT:_=22I'm_Worried_About_Graham=22._=f0=9f=99=8f?= Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:04:38 -0700 Message-ID: <vh2pse$4j5e$11@solani.org> References: <082fddde4a2b233938e15b0969e235ca@www.novabbs.org> <ea05d6bed9418d36980cb05fec4d12dd@www.novabbs.com> <vgjqri$2r6fl$8@dont-email.me> <80a996b2fb2f3e64ef3be19363117f4b@www.novabbs.org> <vgjsd2$2tg39$1@dont-email.me> <c5b478a5d76b74de08cebcd1b05255d8@www.novabbs.org> <lp87kbFtmq1U7@mid.individual.net> <370762c61cda1aeaa6807f4329e9f81d@www.novabbs.org> <lpg8cgF7iv1U2@mid.individual.net> <6732ee1c$2$3831$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <lpgaoiF7iv1U5@mid.individual.net> <07e929da-ac92-f92e-fa69-9f0331bc5baf@example.net> <6734d488$11$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 18:07:10 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="150702"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:aM8rB2G2k+oQGh3eL61VeMOtZwc= X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLDRAeOS0M/xJ2R3V4hznduFwkrsrCiv1OS4xMmukq0FopRfXYzu4hj9nN75XvG/8CFz8y4RUF In-Reply-To: <6734d488$11$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Bytes: 2328 Lines: 20 Mike Duffy wrote: > On 2024-11-12, D wrote: > >> Would it be possible to change the law that says that >> the president has to be born in the US? >> Is it impossible, or a court decision away, >> or would it be a decade long process? > > It requires an amendment to the constitution. But then > others would try to squeeze in amendments about firearms > and the electoral college &c at the same time and it > would get mired in partisan politics. > > Over 10,000 proposals for amendments have been rejected, > and the last amendment (#27) was ratified 32 years ago and > took 203 years to go from a proposal to ratification. > > So I would not bet any money an any changes real soon. > Surprisingly unbiased analysis there.