Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vh3b4u$2e37l$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:01:50 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: <vh3b4u$2e37l$4@dont-email.me> References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vglv58$3bn2s$3@dont-email.me> <cd6cbe7d70fcc282da94aea2107e48ad4b3f44b5@i2pn2.org> <vgm79v$3d9gu$1@dont-email.me> <4b24331953934da921cb7547b6ee2058ac9e7254@i2pn2.org> <vgmb06$3e37h$1@dont-email.me> <2a5107f331836f388ad259bf310311a393c00602@i2pn2.org> <vgnsho$3qq7s$2@dont-email.me> <vgo157$n00$1@news.muc.de> <vgo4ia$3sfle$1@dont-email.me> <vgo7ri$30iv$1@news.muc.de> <vgo89i$3t6n8$1@dont-email.me> <vgoand$2464$1@news.muc.de> <vgobg7$3tnrn$2@dont-email.me> <vgodcf$kll$1@news.muc.de> <vgoed9$3ucjr$1@dont-email.me> <vgoi51$kll$2@news.muc.de> <vgojp1$3v611$1@dont-email.me> <vgol50$kll$3@news.muc.de> <vgom8r$3vue8$1@dont-email.me> <vgonlv$kll$4@news.muc.de> <vgoqv6$qht$2@dont-email.me> <vgq0dv$1trm$1@news.muc.de> <vgqifj$e0q0$2@dont-email.me> <vgqnfl$2ca0$1@news.muc.de> <vgqt2v$gdj5$2@dont-email.me> <vgr04c$dfn$1@news.muc.de> <vgr3vt$hf6i$2@dont-email.me> <vgr5fv$dfn$2@news.muc.de> <vh0nm0$1qvhf$1@dont-email.me> <vh2011$25mt3$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:01:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03e50a320d6e65bd8f9ff48ac19fa030"; logging-data="2559221"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UKTaLDD2jKMBdI/Fmodcm" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:1yFbFT/ClgInSZMwxKkR4wm9Vjc= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vh2011$25mt3$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241113-6, 11/13/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 3659 On 11/13/2024 4:45 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-11-12 23:17:20 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 11/10/2024 2:36 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/10/2024 1:04 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>> >>> [ .... ] >>> >>>>> I have addressed your point perfectly well. Gödel's theorem is >>>>> correct, >>>>> therefore you are wrong. What part of that don't you understand? >>> >>>> YOU FAIL TO SHOW THE DETAILS OF HOW THIS DOES >>>> NOT GET RID OF INCOMPLETENESS. >>> >>> The details are unimportant. Gödel's theorem is correct. Your ideas >>> contradict that theorem. Therefore your ideas are incorrect. Again, >>> the >>> precise details are unimportant, and you wouldn't understand them >>> anyway. Your ideas are as coherent as 2 + 2 = 5. >>> >> >> Incomplete(L) ≡ ∃x ∈ Language(L) ((L ⊬ x) ∧ (L ⊬ ¬x)) > > That's correct (although T is usually used instead of L). > Per this definition the first order group theory and the first order > Peano arithmetic are incomplete. > Every language that can by any means express self-contradiction incorrectly shows that its formal system is incomplete. >> When the above foundational definition ceases to exist then >> Gödel's proof cannot prove incompleteness. > > I doesn't cease to exist. > > It becomes baseless. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer