Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vh3b4u$2e37l$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new
 basis --- infallibly correct
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:01:50 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vh3b4u$2e37l$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <vglv58$3bn2s$3@dont-email.me>
 <cd6cbe7d70fcc282da94aea2107e48ad4b3f44b5@i2pn2.org>
 <vgm79v$3d9gu$1@dont-email.me>
 <4b24331953934da921cb7547b6ee2058ac9e7254@i2pn2.org>
 <vgmb06$3e37h$1@dont-email.me>
 <2a5107f331836f388ad259bf310311a393c00602@i2pn2.org>
 <vgnsho$3qq7s$2@dont-email.me> <vgo157$n00$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgo4ia$3sfle$1@dont-email.me> <vgo7ri$30iv$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgo89i$3t6n8$1@dont-email.me> <vgoand$2464$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgobg7$3tnrn$2@dont-email.me> <vgodcf$kll$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgoed9$3ucjr$1@dont-email.me> <vgoi51$kll$2@news.muc.de>
 <vgojp1$3v611$1@dont-email.me> <vgol50$kll$3@news.muc.de>
 <vgom8r$3vue8$1@dont-email.me> <vgonlv$kll$4@news.muc.de>
 <vgoqv6$qht$2@dont-email.me> <vgq0dv$1trm$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgqifj$e0q0$2@dont-email.me> <vgqnfl$2ca0$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgqt2v$gdj5$2@dont-email.me> <vgr04c$dfn$1@news.muc.de>
 <vgr3vt$hf6i$2@dont-email.me> <vgr5fv$dfn$2@news.muc.de>
 <vh0nm0$1qvhf$1@dont-email.me> <vh2011$25mt3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:01:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03e50a320d6e65bd8f9ff48ac19fa030";
	logging-data="2559221"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UKTaLDD2jKMBdI/Fmodcm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1yFbFT/ClgInSZMwxKkR4wm9Vjc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vh2011$25mt3$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241113-6, 11/13/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3659

On 11/13/2024 4:45 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-11-12 23:17:20 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 11/10/2024 2:36 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/2024 1:04 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>
>>> [ .... ]
>>>
>>>>> I have addressed your point perfectly well.  Gödel's theorem is 
>>>>> correct,
>>>>> therefore you are wrong.  What part of that don't you understand?
>>>
>>>> YOU FAIL TO SHOW THE DETAILS OF HOW THIS DOES
>>>> NOT GET RID OF INCOMPLETENESS.
>>>
>>> The details are unimportant.  Gödel's theorem is correct.  Your ideas
>>> contradict that theorem.  Therefore your ideas are incorrect.  Again, 
>>> the
>>> precise details are unimportant, and you wouldn't understand them
>>> anyway.  Your ideas are as coherent as 2 + 2 = 5.
>>>
>>
>> Incomplete(L) ≡  ∃x ∈ Language(L) ((L ⊬ x) ∧ (L ⊬ ¬x))
> 
> That's correct (although T is usually used instead of L).
> Per this definition the first order group theory and the first order
> Peano arithmetic are incomplete.
> 

Every language that can by any means express self-contradiction
incorrectly shows that its formal system is incomplete.

>> When the above foundational definition ceases to exist then
>> Gödel's proof cannot prove incompleteness.
> 
> I doesn't cease to exist.
> 
> 
It becomes baseless.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer