Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:09:19 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <vh4env$2o2ht$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vfli1h$fj8s$1@dont-email.me> <acecb0ba68d86b00c95fae1ecf690ec514aee26b@i2pn2.org> <vgfq86$24mon$1@dont-email.me> <e7a092c593ad1431a1bf6589d0102312545612ef@i2pn2.org> <vghb16$2ge1v$1@dont-email.me> <e51f21daadd358ef13801c918106c2fdc65a9f6b@i2pn2.org> <vghe3p$2gr3p$1@dont-email.me> <4cb98b3918d6745f53bb19582b59e786d4af5022@i2pn2.org> <vghgar$2h30o$1@dont-email.me> <e40629600e317dba47dd3d066d83899fa7b8a7ab@i2pn2.org> <vgiq1d$2nkqv$1@dont-email.me> <e84328012ce8d1e75b9b569f15f74fde315a0548@i2pn2.org> <vgjd2f$2qdc5$1@dont-email.me> <4654d9db2fa0906d7ab7a1c6c09139ab0b0110cd@i2pn2.org> <vgl7vl$37h38$4@dont-email.me> <vgnph1$3qcpl$1@dont-email.me> <vgns0o$3qq7s$1@dont-email.me> <vgsnod$upmp$1@dont-email.me> <vgt61q$11e5a$3@dont-email.me> <4eebe767dc236a7770566fc1593aae14a38cb085@i2pn2.org> <vgtbpd$12ji4$1@dont-email.me> <49bbc7f6ba667da66bc56c69db049774c066d084@i2pn2.org> <vgvmtb$1kbe2$1@dont-email.me> <vh20o5$25r1d$1@dont-email.me> <vh3bn2$2e37l$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:09:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="458a725cfcbad5272e19bd3e144605a2";
	logging-data="2886205"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SAocu1MgR7OtaR6oIk6HR"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1FZU6oJKGJM5ZwWFOBeFwY2Ap5U=
Bytes: 3242

On 2024-11-13 23:11:30 +0000, olcott said:

> On 11/13/2024 4:58 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-11-12 13:58:03 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 11/12/2024 1:12 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:35:57 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 11/11/2024 10:25 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>> Am Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:58:02 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>> On 11/11/2024 4:54 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-11-09 14:36:07 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/9/2024 7:53 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>> The actual computation itself does involve HHH emulating itself
>>>>>>> emulating DDD. To simply pretend that this does not occur seems
>>>>>>> dishonest.
>>>>>> Which is what you are doing: you pretend that DDD calls some other HHH
>>>>>> that doesn’t abort.
>>>>> DDD emulated by HHH does not reach its "return" instruction final halt
>>>>> state whether HHH aborts its emulation or not.
>>>> When DDD calls a simulator that aborts, that simulator returns to DDD,
>>>> which then halts.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> It is not the same DDD as the DDD under test.
>> 
>> If the DDD under the test is not the same as DDD then the test
>> is performed incorrectly and the test result is not valid.
>> 
> 
> The DDD under test IS THE INPUT DDD
> IT IS STUPIDLY WRONG-HEADED TO THINK OTHERWISE.

I agree that there is only one DDD but above you said otherwise.

-- 
Mikko