Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: USA Election
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:45:50 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <vh4gt0$2oer3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vgccus$2et7$2@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vgm4ks$3cr8r$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ot3vjr7s0auq000@post.eweka.nl> <vgodgp$3u22u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgovie$qo0$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0ot5ax098gnll003@post.eweka.nl>
 <vgr3re$h92v$6@dont-email.me> <vgsjps$u21i$1@dont-email.me>
 <vgtlu8$14tf6$1@dont-email.me> <vgve16$1iii2$2@dont-email.me>
 <vh09o3$1nvis$2@dont-email.me> <vh2221$2641e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vh2v3b$2bjnm$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:46:09 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2d3eb12f40407d20e19b7c3e0fd676b4";
	logging-data="2898787"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19SgaG7aDM551vBVk4PG8xOKNmOeXFdJME="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rl7RsAxshoD8X2CM+sAMJb4pG4k=
In-Reply-To: <vh2v3b$2bjnm$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3830

The True Doctor wrote on 14/11/24 6:36 am:
> On 13/11/2024 11:20, Daniel70 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 13/11/24 6:19 am:
>>> On 12/11/2024 11:26, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 12/11/24 6:29 am:
>>>>> On 11/11/2024 09:46, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 11/11/24 7:08 am:
>>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 12:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Coming from somebody who was also posting here on RADW
>>>>>>>> against a female Doctor from day one (i.e. the day of and
>>>>>>>> after Jodie Whittaker's casting.) I don't know how you can
>>>>>>>> seriously claim you gave her a chance. The evidence proves
>>>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course he gave her a chance. He watched her first episode
>>>>>>> just like over 10 million other people including myself.
>>>>>>> Giving someone a chance don't mean you have to support and
>>>>>>> believe in them from the very start. In fact it means the
>>>>>>> exact opposite, not supporting or believing in them but
>>>>>>> letting them try to persuade you otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When you watched the first 'DoctorDavid' episode, were you
>>>>>> thinking "This is going to be the best thing since sliced
>>>>>> bread" ..... or were you thinking "This could be all right,
>>>>>> I'll give it a go and see what happens??"
>>>>>
>>>>> The latter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same Situation .... this time for 'JodieDoctor'??
>>>>>
>>>> So no responce to my second situation/question??
>>>
>>> You didn't provide any choice.
>>
>> When you watched the first 'JodieDoctor' episode, were you thinking
>> "This is going to be the best thing since sliced bread" ..... or were
>> you thinking "This could be all right, I'll give it a go and see what
>> happens??"
> 
> Neither. I thought it was going to be crap from the opening second when 
> it didn't show the title sequence or play the theme.

"from the opening second"!! WOW!! Way to give ANY program a go, Aggy!!

>>> From the start with its failure to play the opening theme music and
>>> its depiction of a weak male character with dyspraxia

And I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of NEW "Doctor Who" 
episodes have some sort of Story BEFORE the title sequence and theme 
start up!!

Aren't 'they' allowed to show 'disabled'/'differently abled' peoples on 
T.V. now-a-days??
-- 
Daniel