Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Webb shows dark matter theory as false?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:29:15 -0500
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <vh58gr$dt5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <vh1ct8$3mn3$1@solani.org> <vh28m3$274uk$1@dont-email.me> <vh2b30$4nii$1@solani.org> <vh3ph7$2iuro$1@dont-email.me> <vh43k5$5jer$1@solani.org> <vh4jke$2okl2$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:29:15 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="14245"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AFnxuLbsfXuVz5+GaTWcM76iuYE= sha256:o0ChiEpMv38T/73weZAdozlwDAu0qM7Q+EFKm8wR/LE=
	sha1:lrdA2T9vX5siN+yy00eG8OjqgW8= sha256:z45hviSG7I6u0RIafJ4ykx/FtEPdLyCr+sjfZI0Ttig=
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Bytes: 6621

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:vh4jke$2okl2$1@dont-email.me...
> On 14/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>> On a sunny day (Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:07:10 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vh3ph7$2iuro$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On 14/11/2024 12:54 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>> On a sunny day (Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:13:32 +0000) it happened Martin Brown
>>>> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote in <vh28m3$274uk$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 13/11/2024 05:19, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>> Astronomers' theory of how galaxies formed may be upended
>>>>>> New research questions standard model
>>>>>>     https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241112123028.htm
>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>     Case Western Reserve University
>>>>>> Summary:
>>>>>>     The standard model for how galaxies formed in the early universe predicted
>>>>>>     that the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) would see dim signals from small,
>>>>>>     primitive galaxies.
>>>>>>     But data are not confirming the popular hypothesis that invisible dark matter
>>>>>>     helped the earliest stars and galaxies clump together.
>>>>>
>>>>> The CDM theory still isn't beaten yet.
>>>>> Although MOND might appear superficially better on these selected data
>>>>> there is an element of cherry picking going on.
>>>>>
>>>>> It remains to be seen if fainter galaxies even further back are more as
>>>>> CDM predicts. This stuff is right at the limits of detection for the WST
>>>>> so it wouldn't surprise me if the brightest stuff is quite obvious and
>>>>> more common than was expected whilst the faintest smaller objects though
>>>>> more numerous are much harder to see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Several new faint objects in the deep Hubble field have been missed
>>>>> until very recently. There is a nasty and complex sampling interaction
>>>>> between Lyman alpha emission being redshifted to a wavelength we can
>>>>> detect which makes seeing things at this sort of redshift rather tricky.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.space.com/38925-never-before-seen-galaxies-hubble-ultra-deep-field.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I expect the same issue will affect WST in almost the same way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, there is more to it
>>>> I was thinking about what Jeroen from CERN posted about  a paper that proposes
>>>> a space filled with some fluid..
>>>
>>> This s called the "ether theory" and is as dead as the Le sage theory of
>>> gravity.
>>>
>>>> That gives you propagation speed (of light for example) as function of density
>>>> of that fluid I would think,
>>>> and that density may have been dfferent at different times and in different places.
>>>
>>> Sadly, you can't think in any useful way.
>>>
>>>> I see black holes spitting out matter that then form galaxies and those then form stars
>>>> like water coming out of a garden sprinkler in air.
>>>
>>> Black holes can't "spit out matter". Hawking showed that they have to be
>>> able to evaporate matter - but very slowly.
>>>
>>>> So space is not empty,
>>>> is it 'dark matter'?
>>>
>>> Your logic is defective.
>>>
>>>> And if then gravity moves at the speed of light then is it a form of some thing in that same medium?
>>>
>>> A medium that doesn't seem to exist.
>>>
>>>> As to MOND, from what I just wrote, the stars in the spiral arms are _not_ in orbit..
>>>> Just using Einstein's equations must go, we need a mechanism.
>>>
>>> Since you don't understand Einstein's equations, your opinion on their
>>> validity isn't all that interesting.
>>
>> What is sad is that after all the years you still cannot see reality.
>
> That is a matter of opinion. When you think that the the Le Sage Theory of gravity is worth wasting bandwidth on, your own grasp 
> of reality is debatable.
>
>> That is is why you cannot design and do any fault finding.
>
> A bizarre assertion. I was quick to find a couple of faults in Edward Rawdes low distortion 1kHz oscillator. My design skills 
> don't get tested here - I am trying to get my own version the FET based 1kHz oscillator to work, but it is simulating remarkably 
> slowly at the moment (about 10usec/sec).

I have another PC on remote desktop for overnight simulation but I still wouldn't run 10us/s
If you find any more faults in my circuit please let me know.
If you can explain what the dc-trim circuit is actually doing please let me know.

> Something is messing it up - probably the full wave rectifier that depends on an LT1360, and it seems to injecting low level 
> 160kHz hash into the system
>
> The AD734 version I simulated a few years ago is tidier, but the AD734 is remarkably expensive. The LT1360 behaved rather better 
> in that simulation, but maybe they've changed the Spice model since then.
>
>> And obviously you never have read ralated papers and
>> Astronomy and much more is pretty much dead with Albert E.
>
> I just read the popular astronomy  stuff that gets in to New Scientist.
> The field is very far from dead
>>
>> Space is not empty, like yours
>> ;-)
>
> Of course outer space is not empty - even in the emptiest areas there are a still a few hydrogen atoms per cubic centimetre.
>
> https://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/DaWeiCai.shtml
>
> -- 
> Bill Sloman, Sydney
>
>