Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vh5k5r.c08.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: Removing members from text messaging group Date: 14 Nov 2024 18:48:16 GMT Organization: NOYB Lines: 60 Message-ID: <vh5k5r.c08.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> References: <6n0vijp2evnbt3lsbi2g8c0fpgjsg98g44@4ax.com> <isnvpcznirfj$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <6t52jj57d0jct6o4bcss2pb0o389tebig0@4ax.com> <1hegi7ruj8dpq.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <3974jjdkta8h457nbt7utgcria64qcq3s3@4ax.com> <zu3f1swhk9f1$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <lpf2naF30lvU1@mid.individual.net> <lypkvj4aruo8$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <lpk98vFq0oiU4@mid.individual.net> <1pmsw95r1lf3u.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <vh583k.ln8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <1hp068pnt2tfk$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> X-Trace: individual.net S4OdN1oy3ZVDHr8rfliyoAyVP+xfb7nqYCAYMUrypN3EacIFqP X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:tiGZ9R3PHgf9Op9ktApP/xHN94k= sha256:lNJXaQ+KetznxPjZNLjvv8c1wyoNRP4PaomzVly95FM= User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 Bytes: 4220 VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote: [...] > Looks like WhatsApp does text (SMS), chats, and VOIP calls. Maybe > WhatsApp could replace the OP's SMS app, and have even more > functionality. AFAIK, WhatsApp does not do SMS or VOIP calls to regular phones (mobile or landline). It does IM ('chats') and voice/video calls to other WhatsApp users. So WhatsApp would be an addition, not a replacement for an Android SMS/MMS app. > Does WhatsApp do RCS? Even if it does, the other half of that equation > requires a cellular carrier to also support RCS. While the Google > Messages app on my phone supports RCS, my provider (an MVNO) does not. > I thought RCS was supposed to supercede SMS, and an alternative to > WhatsApp, but that doesn't preclude clients from having different > feature sets. No WhatsApp doesn't do RCS. And no, RCS is not superceding SMS, it's an additional functionality. That is, for the US, the rest of the world is already using WhatsApp for years and years. I never send SMS messages. I receive SMS messages, the (very) large majority for the second step in 2SV (if no better method is available). > How about XMPP, so WhatsApp users aren't locked into just chatting with > other WhatsApp users? I never got into chatting (P2P), because the chat > clients only connect with with other users of the same chat app, and > using XMPP seemed like the Rain Man of chat protocols. Plus, like my > true e-mail address that I protect using reply-able aliases (replies to > aliases don't expose the real e-mail address), I don't like publishing > my phone number which then makes it a target for spammers and > malcontents. Interoperability between different IM platforms is one of the issues the EU (Euopean Union) is working on and being a main platform, WhatsApp will be required to interoperate with other IM platforms. However that is future, not present. As to 'publishing' your phone number. We don't have any spammers, etc. here (The Netherlands), because it's illegal here and it's probably the same in most of Europe. Phone spamming seems to be mostly a US thing. Anyway, your WhatsApp 'number' doesn't have to be your main phone number. Any number you 'own' will do and only needs to be used once in a while (for verification). The 'phone number' is actually just an identifier. For example in some cases it can be a landline number and I used WhatsApp on a SIM-less tablet and can use it on my (SIM-less) laptop. > This looks interesting for WhatsApp: > https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2024/08/20/forget-iphone-16-and-ios-18-whatsapp-update-should-stop-you-using-rcs/ > > But I wonder if a username for yourself in WhatsApp is only accessible > to other WhatsApp users. Other users won't know by your WhatsApp > username what is your phone number to contact you via SMS or RCS. Interesting development for the concerns you raised. As I said, in our experience it hasn't been a problem, but additional security/privacy can't hurt.