| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vh5m2f$2ptq3$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: did this group die? Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:20:31 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vh5m2f$2ptq3$2@dont-email.me> References: <vgdt9v$1m4nt$1@dont-email.me> <vgtftc$12ch5$2@dont-email.me> <vgts0k$1657e$1@dont-email.me> <vgu0bq$16u04$1@dont-email.me> <lpfporF68hhU3@mid.individual.net> <vgufi3$osb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vguger$19mh5$1@dont-email.me> <vh09h0$15551$2@dont-email.me> <vh1bke$1lpl$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vh1ept$22ims$1@dont-email.me> <564688559.753195850.676611.recscuba_google-huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vh34tp$8bh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:20:32 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5e278b906627c5d7f166f1d3332d444"; logging-data="2946883"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uVZqPXvfSz0+gCfvIWT7bolh/8bKgM6E=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:5iOdSGAc0pBk3MgKbcp8XUe+e4Q= In-Reply-To: <vh34tp$8bh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2741 On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote: > -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 : > >> And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims >> have used catenary? > > A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh". Pedantically, sure ... > It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of > force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics. ....but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in reality. Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners. > My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of > the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics. But they're not who needs to think things through more completely, particularly in looking at theory vs applied. > [more reams of butthurt whining ... snipped] -hh