| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vh7702$3btjp$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking Subject: Re: OT: "I'm Worried About Graham". =?UTF-8?Q?=F0=9F=99=8F?= Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:15:30 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <vh7702$3btjp$3@dont-email.me> References: <082fddde4a2b233938e15b0969e235ca@www.novabbs.org> <ea05d6bed9418d36980cb05fec4d12dd@www.novabbs.com> <vgjqri$2r6fl$8@dont-email.me> <80a996b2fb2f3e64ef3be19363117f4b@www.novabbs.org> <vgjsd2$2tg39$1@dont-email.me> <c5b478a5d76b74de08cebcd1b05255d8@www.novabbs.org> <lp87kbFtmq1U7@mid.individual.net> <370762c61cda1aeaa6807f4329e9f81d@www.novabbs.org> <lpg8cgF7iv1U2@mid.individual.net> <6732ee1c$2$3831$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <lpgaoiF7iv1U5@mid.individual.net> <07e929da-ac92-f92e-fa69-9f0331bc5baf@example.net> <lpntqtFca64U2@mid.individual.net> Reply-To: hamilton@invalid.com Injection-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:15:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2915a74aca85fbda160b634f81a9de5"; logging-data="3536505"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yKeM9vsF2ZGRkayDnppYsjuXEjs+vrU8=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:m5ENNWdg2opWWfCo5igobibg/NQ= Bytes: 2373 On 2024-11-15, Leonard Blaisdell <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On 2024-11-12, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to change the law that says that the president has to >> be born in the US? Is it impossible, or a court decision away, or would it >> be a decade long process? > > > A Constitutional Convention, allowed by the Constitution, could throw > out the Constitution. All we have to do is come together and have one. > Or, we could just throw out or change the parts we don't like. > ;) :) :( ?!?!?!. Do you really think that's a good idea? We might end up without the protections currently afforded by the Second Amendment. Or the First Amendment, depending on who's in charge at the time. It would be easier to amend the Constitution, which "only" requires 2/3 of both the House and Senate and 3/4 of state legislatures to vote in favor of it. Piece of cake. -- Cindy Hamilton