Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:21:02 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vh9o5u$3un1v$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <vga5mb$st52$1@dont-email.me> <vga7qi$talf$1@dont-email.me> <03b90d6c-fff1-411d-9dec-1c5cc7058480@tha.de> <vgb1fj$128tl$1@dont-email.me> <vgb2r6$11df6$3@dont-email.me> <vgcs35$1fq8n$1@dont-email.me> <vgfepg$22hhn$1@dont-email.me> <vgg0ic$25pcn$1@dont-email.me> <vggai3$25spe$8@dont-email.me> <vgi0t7$2ji2i$1@dont-email.me> <vgiet5$2l5ni$1@dont-email.me> <vgl2hj$3794c$1@dont-email.me> <vgleau$bi0i$2@solani.org> <vgnq3i$3qgfe$1@dont-email.me> <vgoka6$3vg2p$1@dont-email.me> <vgq1cm$b5vj$1@dont-email.me> <vgq3ca$beif$1@dont-email.me> <vgsp1c$v1ss$1@dont-email.me> <vgsq2v$v5t1$1@dont-email.me> <vgvm6h$1k8co$1@dont-email.me> <vgvmvr$1kc5f$1@dont-email.me> <vh1vlb$25kic$1@dont-email.me> <vh2j89$29gco$1@dont-email.me> <vh4f7p$2o5hn$1@dont-email.me> <vh4job$2ov2c$1@dont-email.me> <vh78jp$3cbq7$1@dont-email.me> <vh7d5c$3cpaf$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:21:02 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="adc74453b133be1c8bcb5c026250e294";
	logging-data="4152383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Bp6UISnfb0g1sGoQVAVOh"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oDSvW3bRT/Kvgc8yMXuy+5D1rFc=
Bytes: 2421

On 2024-11-15 12:00:43 +0000, WM said:

> On 15.11.2024 11:43, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-11-14 10:34:52 +0000, WM said:
> 
>>> No. Covering by intervals is completely independent of their 
>>> individuality and therefore of their order.
>> 
>> Translated intervals are not the same as the original ones. Not only their
>> order but also their positions can be different as demonstrated by your
>> example and mine, too.
> 
> If the do not cover the whole figure in their initial order, then they 
> cannot do so in any other order.

So you want to retract your claims that involve another order?

-- 
Mikko