Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating
 itself emulating DDD --- anyone that says otherwise is a liar
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:46:43 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <vhgck3$1ei4a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhdd32$oq0l$1@dont-email.me> <vhf257$16a9p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhg8qq$1duv3$1@dont-email.me>
 <1faff0266d203c301ed017aa69027ffd166f32ad@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:46:44 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9eeddbf0661af45b9b764b78cd434096";
	logging-data="1525898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197zQ+mDw0ttUXBCORoosrx"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vYRtmq1JJD2HUROcGe/o34CO7iU=
In-Reply-To: <1faff0266d203c301ed017aa69027ffd166f32ad@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241118-8, 11/18/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3489

On 11/18/2024 3:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/18/24 3:42 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/18/2024 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> The "the mapping" on the subject line is not correct. The subject line
>>> does not specify which mapping and there is no larger context that could
>>> specify that. Therefore it should be "a mapping".
>>>
>>> On 2024-11-17 18:36:17 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>    return;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> DDD emulated by any encoding of HHH that emulates N
>>>> to infinity number of steps of DDD cannot possibly
>>>> reach its "return" instruction final halt state.
>>>
>>> Because it cannot reach the instructions before tha return.
>>> Because it cannot reach the instruction after the HHH call.
>>> Because it cannot reach return instruction of HHH.
>>>
>>>> This applies to every DDD emulated by any HHH no
>>>> matter the recursive depth of emulation. Thus it is
>>>> a verified fact that the input to HHH never halts.
>>>
>>> That is too vague to be regareded true or false. It is perfectly possibe
>>> to define two programs and call them DDD and HHH 
>>
>> What a jackass. DDD and HHH have been fully specified
>> for many months.
> 
> No, you keep on changing them, after all, you say there is one set of 
> code, but an infinite set of pairings, and even though for every one of 
> them the HHH that DDD calls gives the wrong answer, you want to define 
> it as correct.
> 

Top of page 2 Jackass

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer