Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vhhl99$1p34v$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why can't relativists understand this? Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:20:41 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 24 Message-ID: <vhhl99$1p34v$1@dont-email.me> References: <13f24519606de3eb063e94f4f373dce3@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:20:42 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="372ec1d83ec1367d064c914bd5c169b9"; logging-data="1871007"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+c3mWsFSDFdefoB7qmsFBM" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gJKnGMiXplfQ0WfglH586ldJvq8= Bytes: 1540 On 2024-11-18 21:32:22 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: > Why can't relativists understand this? Your question includes an assumption. Why do you assume that there is an relartivist that does not understand all of that? > A. There is no ether. In a non-existence there is not much to understand. But is there any quedje? > B. There is no ether wind. That is obvious from A. > C. Therefore, there is no time dilation. That C does not follow from A and B is easily understood although the required understanding is about logic and not relativity. -- Mikko