Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: OT: Repeatably lobbing "projectiles"
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:04:45 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vhmm2k$hpg1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 08:04:53 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3cee58121027d9a8e4865ed6f7ca0aa0";
	logging-data="583169"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RNie68i6QvRA19u55vcP2"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BCjP6z7+eO0UCpVgxoyxpvKOrAk=
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1861

We're trying to make a mechanism that will allow for the
REPEATABLE lobbing of small projectiles over short (0-20 ft)
distances.

We've tried using a constant force with a variable launch angle
(higher for shorter).

And, a variable force with a constant launch angle (push harder
to throw farther).

The former seems to be easier to get repeatability.  But, still
not great as it constrains HOW you develop the force to be applied.

A ferrous projectile would probably be easier to control
(think: rail gun) but then the projectile starts to become a safety
issue.

Now, we're looking at alternate ways of developing that propulsive
force -- e.g., controlled air or water (messy!) pressure.  But,
I suspect qualifying the release valves' performance will prove to
be a stumbling point (and, how it changes).

Any other ideas, given latitude in the design of the projectile?