Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vhmtph$j1ek$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 11:16:33 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 20 Message-ID: <vhmtph$j1ek$1@dont-email.me> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vgg0ic$25pcn$1@dont-email.me> <vggai3$25spe$8@dont-email.me> <vgi0t7$2ji2i$1@dont-email.me> <vgiet5$2l5ni$1@dont-email.me> <vgl2hj$3794c$1@dont-email.me> <vgleau$bi0i$2@solani.org> <vgnq3i$3qgfe$1@dont-email.me> <vgoka6$3vg2p$1@dont-email.me> <vgq1cm$b5vj$1@dont-email.me> <vgq3ca$beif$1@dont-email.me> <vgsp1c$v1ss$1@dont-email.me> <vgsq2v$v5t1$1@dont-email.me> <vgvm6h$1k8co$1@dont-email.me> <vgvmvr$1kc5f$1@dont-email.me> <vh1vlb$25kic$1@dont-email.me> <vh2j89$29gco$1@dont-email.me> <vh4f7p$2o5hn$1@dont-email.me> <vh4job$2ov2c$1@dont-email.me> <vh78jp$3cbq7$1@dont-email.me> <vh7d5c$3cpaf$1@dont-email.me> <5b8de1bc-9f6c-4dde-a7cd-9e22e8ce19d9@att.net> <vhata3$59e5$2@dont-email.me> <31419fde-62b3-46f3-89f6-a48f1fe82bc0@att.net> <vhc77g$hdd4$1@dont-email.me> <476ae6cb-1116-44b1-843e-4be90d594372@att.net> <vhhr6f$1q0r9$1@dont-email.me> <ffa63cb5-8898-4aa7-80eb-8b2c51c9986d@att.net> <vhkhun$28qt$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:16:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d333dea12437121c1d45e82a4f30cae6"; logging-data="624084"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+t3P44q8nBPm3UfhK7Z/tp" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:f4D6X/c8+AvVFEu2KKlZQkdvFBY= Bytes: 2285 On 2024-11-20 11:42:15 +0000, WM said: > On 19.11.2024 17:26, Jim Burns wrote: >> On 11/19/2024 6:01 AM, WM wrote: > >>> That implies that >>> our well-known intervals >> >> Sets with different intervals are different. >> Our sets do not change. > > The intervals before and after shifting are not different. Only their > positions are. The intervals are different. A shifted interval contains a different set of numbers. -- Mikko