Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:43:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vhqfrs$bit$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87zflrs1ti.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <vhqed2$c71$2@reader2.panix.com> <87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:43:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="11869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1998
Lines: 37

In article <87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
>> In article <87zflrs1ti.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
>> Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:
>>>Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>> Something which would match [0-9]+ in its first argument (if any) would
>>>> be:
>>>>
>>>> #include "string.h"
>>>> #include "stdlib.h"
>>>>
>>>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>> {
>>>>     char *p;
>>>>     unsigned c;
>>>>
>>>>     p = argv[1];
>>>>     if (!p) exit(1);
>>>>     while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 10) ++p;
>>>
>>>This needs to be
>>>
>>>while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 9) ++p
>>
>> No, that's still wrong.  Try actually running it.
>
>If you know something that's wrong with that, why not write it instead
>of utilizing the claim for pointless (and wrong) snide remarks?

I did, at length, in my other post.

	- Dan C.