Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andys@nospam.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Piece of shit iOS has absolutely zero privacy for God's sake
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:45:59 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <vhqjh6$23ed$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <vhgjd5$2ta1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vhgmdl$1gf32$1@dont-email.me> <e63%O.77978$7Lh8.40536@usenetxs.com> <bp4%O.29316$vojd.11372@fx11.iad> <ST2dnRvcS5gpyqD6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vhqcdh$2sl5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <xn0otm6n7386d3r004@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:45:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="69069"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oR7dI1RHCn3dydwlPMKWUVIHXfo= sha256:DseNV0tP2ZrsHu+fAw7IJplmXDgxC/5vnUgttYcUUj0=
	sha1:6/sepFhCHo/sUszP49gSddfDBkc= sha256:MO9Uqxe0f3kT+1FbDbGU6O7T+gr4cEDhwW0AAZqfHlo=
Bytes: 4379
Lines: 61

badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :

>>We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as you
>>refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
>>Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start to
>>become normal again
> 
> I'd have to excuse Chris from that list.  He seems far more reasonable
> than the rest of the hive.

I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of the
hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd put them
into these loose groupings of similar personalities when posting here. 


Jolly Roger === Lewis
Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
Haemactylus === Your Name
Alan Browne === Chris
nospam === he is in a category of his own

The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far more
about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even as if we
took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing - but he was
simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not needed & not wanted.

Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually think
for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne *loves* to quote Apple white papers, and
Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the walled-garden
restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to pay dearly to be
admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some things on an adult level.

Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences are that
the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former two do not, and,
what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never related to the topic.

Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference being
Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their own
amusement.

When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this newsgroup
for at least as long as I have and who is the classic epitome of the Apple
troll.

To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple troll
team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that Jolly Roger
hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type of inane childish
vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully in all ways possible).

As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple trolls,
in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without any qualms.

Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic
completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves that
such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible to those
that do simply because they have been told their entire lives that they're
stupid - and they want to get back at everyone else for doing that to them.

Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with those
clarifying distinctions above?