Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vhqpra$1b1e7$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Repeatably lobbing "projectiles"
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:37:35 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vhqpra$1b1e7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhmm2k$hpg1$1@dont-email.me> <vhn6hv$kcv9$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn7p9$klsd$1@dont-email.me> <vhn9cs$kvbs$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn9u8$klsd$3@dont-email.me> <vhngkm$m5fp$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhnr2o$nurs$1@dont-email.me> <vhokk1$rvpm$3@dont-email.me>
 <vhorqs$t438$5@dont-email.me> <vhp11p$119hi$2@dont-email.me>
 <vhp69q$12dgb$2@dont-email.me> <vhqijd$19o2c$1@dont-email.me>
 <V250P.7783$hgYd.3742@fx41.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:33:47 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="095b2f77757134a04008575d6f4c2e80";
	logging-data="1410503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bCRBwndCt60jbvPvNWCL3"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EKVRtJJtTlAu3E9sd0nP7kShbqY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <V250P.7783$hgYd.3742@fx41.iad>
Bytes: 2760

On 11/22/24 20:36, Anass Luca wrote:
> bp@www.zefox.net wrote:
>> Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
>>> Most "guns" just want to achieve a "maximum" (range,
>>> load, etc.)
>>
>> Not sure I understand what you're getting at here. On
>> the face of it that statement seems mistaken.
> 
> You are interacting with "Don Y".  If you go review other postings
> where "Don Y" has initiated a thread like this one you will find that
> the "Don Y" poster quite effectively trolls the group every single
> time.  The initial post is always ambigious and seriously lacking in
> necessary details, such that 234+ wrong possibilities could be seen by
> readers.  And as others in the group request details to try to gain an
> understanding from the vague, detail lacking initial post, they are
> slowly tricked out over the course of days and plural postings from
> "Don Y", intermixed with numerous random asides to maximize confusion.
> Meanwhile, as the supposed details are trickled out, the apparent
> requirements needed also shift as posters appear to gain any
> understanding in order to keep the responders in the dark and allow the
> "Don Y" trolling articles to continue to troll everyone who responds.
> 
> 

That is unfortunately a rather accurate characterization, I concede.

Jeroen Belleman