| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vhqpra$1b1e7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Repeatably lobbing "projectiles" Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:37:35 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <vhqpra$1b1e7$1@dont-email.me> References: <vhmm2k$hpg1$1@dont-email.me> <vhn6hv$kcv9$1@dont-email.me> <vhn7p9$klsd$1@dont-email.me> <vhn9cs$kvbs$1@dont-email.me> <vhn9u8$klsd$3@dont-email.me> <vhngkm$m5fp$1@dont-email.me> <vhnr2o$nurs$1@dont-email.me> <vhokk1$rvpm$3@dont-email.me> <vhorqs$t438$5@dont-email.me> <vhp11p$119hi$2@dont-email.me> <vhp69q$12dgb$2@dont-email.me> <vhqijd$19o2c$1@dont-email.me> <V250P.7783$hgYd.3742@fx41.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:33:47 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="095b2f77757134a04008575d6f4c2e80"; logging-data="1410503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bCRBwndCt60jbvPvNWCL3" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:EKVRtJJtTlAu3E9sd0nP7kShbqY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <V250P.7783$hgYd.3742@fx41.iad> Bytes: 2760 On 11/22/24 20:36, Anass Luca wrote: > bp@www.zefox.net wrote: >> Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >>> Most "guns" just want to achieve a "maximum" (range, >>> load, etc.) >> >> Not sure I understand what you're getting at here. On >> the face of it that statement seems mistaken. > > You are interacting with "Don Y". If you go review other postings > where "Don Y" has initiated a thread like this one you will find that > the "Don Y" poster quite effectively trolls the group every single > time. The initial post is always ambigious and seriously lacking in > necessary details, such that 234+ wrong possibilities could be seen by > readers. And as others in the group request details to try to gain an > understanding from the vague, detail lacking initial post, they are > slowly tricked out over the course of days and plural postings from > "Don Y", intermixed with numerous random asides to maximize confusion. > Meanwhile, as the supposed details are trickled out, the apparent > requirements needed also shift as posters appear to gain any > understanding in order to keep the responders in the dark and allow the > "Don Y" trolling articles to continue to troll everyone who responds. > > That is unfortunately a rather accurate characterization, I concede. Jeroen Belleman