Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:10:09 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vhr30h$qid$2@reader2.panix.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87cyinthjk.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <vhqs7k$btv$1@reader2.panix.com> <87cyimapjr.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 23:10:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="27213"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1909
Lines: 24

In article <87cyimapjr.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
>
>[...]
>
>>>That's a mistake I made which would have warranted being pointed out and
>>>possibly explained instead of posting some broken code together with
>>>some output the broken code certainly never generated due it being
>>>broken.
>>
>> Perhaps if you stopped being so unbearably smug and pretentious
>> in your judgements people would give you that grace.  As it is,
>> you come across as thin-skinned and terribly insecure, and your
>> code shows a lack of competence.
>
>I suggest you print this and pin to to a place you frequently look
>at. This may eventually lead you to a much more realistic assessment of
>yourself than you presently seem to have.

*shrug* If you don't want to be criticized, don't be wrong so
often.  Not my problem if you don't program well.

	- Dan C.