Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vhr4r7$1cecu$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Repeatably lobbing "projectiles"
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:41:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <vhr4r7$1cecu$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vhmm2k$hpg1$1@dont-email.me>
 <m02vjjtfpcppf5ljrfl740k10oj44b4l96@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 00:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01962a914581412c1fe91addb5218a72";
	logging-data="1456542"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vWat3E7LcJO8Yd5RLMG8o"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v+f8tY/dPLqXBh9C5cvwk9TtrGU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <m02vjjtfpcppf5ljrfl740k10oj44b4l96@4ax.com>
Bytes: 3129

On 11/21/2024 12:23 PM, Joe Gwinn wrote:
>> Any other ideas, given latitude in the design of the projectile?
> 
> It sounds like you need a steel-spring crossbow mechanism as the
> starting point.

The fact that this keeps coming up is interesting.
ISTM that it would be harder to electronically control
such a stiff mechanism; you'd need something strong
enough to counter its force to "cock" it and something
to ensure it is cocked to a particular tension
(strain gage or position transducer).

I think I'm going to explore the air solution, next.

I figure I can use a surplus oxygen tank (they come in
smaller sizes for portability) so I know it will
handle any sort of pressure I might apply without
rupturing.  I can probably fashion an inlet port
and outlet valve to mate to it via the single
opening available (so I don't have to pierce the
vessel to allow for the introduction of pressurizing
air).

I'm *guessing* that a battery powered "inflator" that
one might use to fill tires could achieve whatever
pressure I need (?).  The chamber acting as a reservoir
to allow a larger volume of air to be expelled than
the inflator could supply in a short interval.

[The "reload time" may become an issue.  But, a larger
inflator -- or a real *compressor* -- should address
that shortcoming]

The barrel can be anything that "fits" the projectiles
(likely something round so loading it doesn't require
a particular orientation and facilitates "dispensing"
from a "magazine"/hopper)

A linear actuator to adjust the elevation of the barrel.
(note the compressed air tank can be coupled to the barrel
via a semi-flexible conduit so it need not be moved
with the barrel)

This then boils down to how repeatable a valve I can find.

Calibration can then just be done empirically:  set the
elevation and vary the pressure -- tabulate results.
Lather, rinse, repeat.  Analyze data for variance.
Tweek mechanism.