| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vhtjdo$1mdu7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Should I use Dogelog? Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:02:31 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <vhtjdo$1mdu7$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:02:32 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f9b007d4e148887883b0f0a84a99fac0"; logging-data="1783751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NcwuAI5GQGXTxsokX6VtCYwJomBSX7bo=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:S7JWLIKGm6dObkCT+68z9wTSG+Q= Content-Language: en-GB I am looking for a *clean and mean* Prolog implementation: Dogelog at a cursory inspection (I have had a look at docs and code at www.xlog.ch) looks like a pretty good candidate. Just it quite bothers me that it is not "free software", so I would not be able to fork it not even as an extreme measure. Rationale/any plans to open it say under GPL (i.e. free for non-commercial use)? BTW, any plans to implement a library like SWI's prolog_trace? <https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=prologtrace> I am finding that quite useful for debugging. -Julio