Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vhuc4c$23ufn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: "Answer The Gawdamn Question!": Katie Couric Takes Kamala Apart In 2024 Post-Mortem With Jen Psaki - "She answered like in one sentence and like went on to something that had nothing to do with the question." Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:04:15 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <vhuc4c$23ufn$1@dont-email.me> References: <vhirbi$20k7c$1@dont-email.me> <vll4kjh3u176u8i259kdp8b2a1u2v4q4c5@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:04:13 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="adee2708912716d748af2bec27fa6fbb"; logging-data="2226679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HV44Pcr9MYXBXfcUt9i1E" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:szOYPPalKj+JZTAxjWHXf6eoImM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vll4kjh3u176u8i259kdp8b2a1u2v4q4c5@4ax.com> Bytes: 2334 On 11/23/2024 2:29 PM, The Horny Goat wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:07:15 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> > wrote: > >> Couric couched her criticism by first saying that she felt Harris had handled >> some things very well, but then she pointed out Harris' tendency to evade >> questions even when she did sit for interviews. She noted that people weren't >> likely to be convinced when Harris didn't give satisfactory answers. > > My main objection to Harris in the debates (which I watched) was that > she tended to be speaking to her supporters rather than the general > public. > Yet that is exactly what Trump did, basically speak only to his supporters. > It's great to shore up support with your supporters but if you want to > win you've got to at least attempt to pick up more and I don't think > she even tried much. > > That said, I think Vance did a considerably better job in his debate > than Trump did in his. Particularly when he called out the "fact > checkers" -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.