Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vhuc4c$23ufn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: "Answer The Gawdamn Question!": Katie Couric Takes Kamala Apart
 In 2024 Post-Mortem With Jen Psaki - "She answered like in one sentence and
 like went on to something that had nothing to do with the question."
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:04:15 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <vhuc4c$23ufn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhirbi$20k7c$1@dont-email.me>
 <vll4kjh3u176u8i259kdp8b2a1u2v4q4c5@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:04:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="adee2708912716d748af2bec27fa6fbb";
	logging-data="2226679"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HV44Pcr9MYXBXfcUt9i1E"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:szOYPPalKj+JZTAxjWHXf6eoImM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vll4kjh3u176u8i259kdp8b2a1u2v4q4c5@4ax.com>
Bytes: 2334

On 11/23/2024 2:29 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:07:15 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> Couric couched her criticism by first saying that she felt Harris had handled
>> some things very well, but then she pointed out Harris' tendency to evade
>> questions even when she did sit for interviews. She noted that people weren't
>> likely to be convinced when Harris didn't give satisfactory answers.
> 
> My main objection to Harris in the debates (which I watched) was that
> she tended to be speaking to her supporters rather than the general
> public.
> 
Yet that is exactly what Trump did, basically speak only to his supporters.

> It's great to shore up support with your supporters but if you want to
> win you've got to at least attempt to pick up more and I don't think
> she even tried much.
> 
> That said, I think Vance did a considerably better job in his debate
> than Trump did in his. Particularly when he called out the "fact
> checkers"


-- 
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky 
dirty old man.