| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vi03oi$2cs91$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Ideas and copyright law Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:53:40 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <vi03oi$2cs91$2@dont-email.me> References: <vi035f$2cpcl$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:53:38 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="adee2708912716d748af2bec27fa6fbb"; logging-data="2519329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2Uc2CVeLXCxYgcu0vvOx4" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+VPv86EMFrhxmorEHzKCXIsCJck= In-Reply-To: <vi035f$2cpcl$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2396 On 11/24/2024 12:43 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: > Two threads merge! > > Arthur mentioned watching Sister Act. BTR1701 said ideas cannot be > copyrighted. > > Sister Act was subject to a copyright infringement lawsuit. From IMDb's > helpfully uncited source, > > On June 10, 1993, Donna Douglas and her partner Curt Wilson in > Associated Artists Entertainment, Inc., filed a $200 million > lawsuit against Disney, Whoopi Goldberg, Bette Midler, their > production companies, and Creative Artists Agency, claiming that > this movie was plagiarized from the book "A Nun in the Closet", > owned by the partners. Douglas and Wilson claimed that they had > developed a screenplay for the book in 1985, and submitted it to > Disney, Goldberg, and Midler three times in 1987 and 1988. They > also claimed that the movie contained more than 100 similarities > and plagiarisms from the book and screenplay. In 1994, Douglas > and Wilson declined a $1 million offer to settle the case. The > judge found in favor of Walt Disney Pictures and the other > defendants. Wilson stated at the time, "They would have had to > copy our stuff verbatim for us to prevail." Which would explain why Hollywood never does a faithful adaptation of a book. :P -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.