Article <vi099v$2dmhe$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<vi099v$2dmhe$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!fdn.fr!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!news1.firedrake.org!news.xcski.com!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Sabine Hossenfleder reports on a study that finds that the
 universe is not fine tuned for life
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:28:15 -0500
Organization: Eek
Lines: 67
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vi099v$2dmhe$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhvl56$2aca9$1@dont-email.me>
 <q477kj97qv3cbcg5gs4m9f43r96gp4ki2l@4ax.com>
Reply-To: jtem01@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="37944"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fca3kW5Y71F8g14zS+aDk1jU/mU=
In-Reply-To: <q477kj97qv3cbcg5gs4m9f43r96gp4ki2l@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
	FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 4943

On 11/24/24 4:53 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:

  I don't know why Sabine Hossenfelder hates
> the multiverse, but she's doing the right by trying to falsify it
> (which I would consider one of the weaknesses of the multiverse theory
> --  that is, how to test it).

There isn't "A" Multiverse Theory. There are many.

"A" multiverse is already scientifically confirmed, or at least
it would be for you if you had any reading comprehension and
critical thinking skills.

Google:  einstein simultaneity

It's supposedly confirmed, scientifically.

It's describing "A" multiverse.

So isn't time, as Einstein describes it. It's scientifically
confirmed -- "Time is relative" -- and that is the
Multiverse!

The biggest issue with the Multiverse is... okay, the TWO
biggest issues are 1)  People are idiots and 2) it's not
the "Multiverse" that we want it to be. Not according to
what hard science we have confirming it.

We want the "Multiverse" to be like two completely walled
off spaces and we'd need some New Age mumbo jumbo or Star
Trek technology to breach that wall.

       ...in another version a "Different" universe pops
into existence every time you make a decision! You turn
right, two universes pop into existence, one where you
turn left instead of right...

Nope.

There's only one universe, "The Multiverse" which is this
one and only universe existing in all potential states at
once.

That's it, according to the hard science.

It's easy even for the likes of you to image a universe
where everything happens all at once, where time isn't
real. You can conceptualize that. So take it one step
further and instead of conceptualizing everything happening
all at once, imagine every POTENTIAL happening all at
once.

It's really not much of a stretch, nor any stretch at all
when you overlay time dilation or Simultaneity.

And if you want to confuse yourself any further, do the
Google on "Light Cone."

If you can grasp it, and I'm not saying I can, you can
see how we all effectively exist inside of a different
reality even if in most every case the differences are
too small to even measure, much less perceive.



-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5