Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: rec.autos.sport.f1
Subject: Re: Jaguar used to be in F1. Anyone see it's new ad?
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:20:45 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>
References: <sK50P.182569$Oi5e.80432@fx15.iad> <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <5bc445aecbbob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>
 <5bc5417561bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>
 <5bc56ff518bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <vi2cme$2t2sk$1@dont-email.me>
 <5bc572230bbob@sick-of-spam.invalid> <vi2hqj$2u6id$1@dont-email.me>
 <5bc57c7b9fbob@sick-of-spam.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:20:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84d9b5791a14df4f55f56f980298ddb7";
	logging-data="3205522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19H3UKoCBLFWCvQzkeKeA/swmegxSMPn5w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:W8RmdJS0DJSbk8IKe1SI9BQSP/M=
In-Reply-To: <5bc57c7b9fbob@sick-of-spam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 4226

On 2024-11-25 11:48, Bob Latham wrote:
> In article <vi2hqj$2u6id$1@dont-email.me>,
>     Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-11-25 09:55, Bob Latham wrote:
>>> In article <vi2cme$2t2sk$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>      Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
>>>>> In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>       Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>        Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>         Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The insecure lash out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one
>>>>>>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
>>>>>>>> Describe exactly what you mean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
>>>>>>> specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's exactly what I thought...
>>>>>
>>>>>> ...bigot.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Under the current circumstances where people who believe in
>>>>> reality as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are
>>>>> called bigots I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
>>>
>>>> I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
>>>
>>> And lefties adore little more than insulting their opponents it's
>>> always their first action. They do this because their various
>>> arguments are so weak that they're easily demolished by people
>>> like Douglas Murray who never fails to wipe the floor with them.
>> You're a bigot, Bob.
> 
>> Plain and simple.
> 
>> Judging people because they are different than you is the very
>> heart and soul of bigotry.
> 
> Sorry you don't understand my position.
> 
> I'm not judging anyone and before you say it, I don't hate anyone
> either. I am however, judging current modern ideologies and religions
> which deny objective truth.  I'm happy for anyone to live as they
> wish to live *provided* that lifestyle isn't to the detriment of
> other people's lives.
> 
> My problem comes when I'm expected to say things and agree with
> things that are clearly nonsense. Or indeed when I hear people making
> these absurd claims especially when there are children around.
> 
> Abandoning reality because it doesn't fit modern sensitivities is the
> heart and soul of stupidity. Objective truth will remain even if it's
> not sayable in "progressive" company.
Who do you think you're fooling?

Racists made EXACTLY the same argument about people whose skin was a 
different colour.

They claimed it was "objective truth" that certain people were inferior.