Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole
 brain
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:41:37 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <vi4c5m$3e6ps$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhuhb7$jl5b$1@solani.org> <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>
 <vhv9f7$1g4or$1@solani.org> <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi13nk$1klee$1@solani.org> <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi25fd$f1h$2@solani.org> <vi3f10$3732f$1@dont-email.me>
 <1r3mf79.4axrbbhp5h7yN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:41:43 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58cf3b946643542dc32c1971f9d5da96";
	logging-data="3611452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KNyGcnCcD8VTCocCyvjP8aGLtIQ6MM54="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0PMchDJolak2KtPevXNeScl1jt0=
In-Reply-To: <1r3mf79.4axrbbhp5h7yN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241126-2, 26/11/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3734

On 26/11/2024 7:26 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 26/11/2024 2:35 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>> On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>> On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
>>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>>> On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
>>>>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
>>>> really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they
>>>> really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
>>>> he spouts that kind of nonsense.
>>>
>>> He is against the global Woarming religious fanatic groups, many people
>>> are fed up with that dogma.
>>
>> Except that it isn't any kind of religion. It's based on scientific
>> investigation, not dogmatic assertion,
> 
> It is followed like a religion and a lot of the 'science' in the popular
> media is utter rubbish.

The Murdoch media do publish a lot of climate change denial propaganda. 
I'm sure that they are paid well for doing it.

> There may be some good science somewhere, but
> unless it supports the popular beliefs and dogmatic assertions it is
> never heard - that seems like religion to me.

There is a lot of good science in all the good science places.
Newspapers like the Guardian with a commitment to publishing reliable 
information push the more digestible parts of it from time to time, but 
British science journalism isn't great. George Monbiot has specialised 
in the area, but he's unusual. Dutch science journalists do tend to have 
science degrees and can do better.

Good science doesn't look anything like religion. If you know enough to 
understand the science you won't make that mistake.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney
> 
>