Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net!.POSTED.omega.home.tnetconsulting.net!not-for-mail
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: [LINK] Calling time on DNSSEC?
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:55:00 -0600
Organization: TNet Consulting
Message-ID: <vi68n4$k3r$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>
References: <67464f37@news.ausics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 04:55:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net; posting-host="omega.home.tnetconsulting.net:198.18.1.11";
	logging-data="20603"; mail-complaints-to="newsmaster@tnetconsulting.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <67464f37@news.ausics.net>

On 11/26/24 16:44, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>   How have we got to this point?" ...

Too many people stop once they achieve what they think is the minimum 
viable product.  Basic insecure DNS is that MVP when it comes to name 
resolution.

People move on to other MVP tasks that demand their attention and never 
get back around to DNSSEC.

I've been using DNSSEC for 10-15 years with effectively minimal problems.



-- 
Grant. . . .