Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:58:48 +1300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vi6fv8$3ta2v$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uonckjdcje9bb6h3ajb0um6edmvl3lkt9i@4ax.com> <02pckj9ra93ph3i2o4ukohrcb77abqsj1f@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 07:58:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="16ddb5128d1b1437b7296198f00526be";
	logging-data="4106335"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1DwlLsYwpN6sM7jjezsb08K+8otTNyjo="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YRwwpJgsJcCe2NygMQM6YItmZ6c=
Bytes: 1877

On 2024-11-27 00:15:06 +0000, Joel said:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> ...the M1 Mac Mini had support for 4K video OOTB
>>>> and could run a 4K and
>>>> a 6K monitor simultaneously.
>>>> 
>>>> All for $700USD.
>>>> 
>>>> But I guess there wouldn't have been "bragging rights" with his 1337 crew.
>>>> 
>>>> :-)
>>> 
>>> And it had how much storage, again?  Heh.
>> 
>> You imagine that as some great "gotcha", do you?
> 
> Yeah, it is, because it's where Apple rips people off.  Why is 256 GB
> still the basic option?  In almost 2025?  Retarded.

Because you obviously don't understand Apple's CPUs and / or stuck in 
the same old MHz-myth style nonsense that caused Apple to swap to Intel 
CPU years ago. Apple's chips simply don't actually need as much RAM as 
Intel CISC CPUs do.