Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vi7ikf$39pr$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: JAB <here@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss
Subject: Re: $7,500 credit for EV vehicles
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:50:28 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vi7ikf$39pr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vi3imp$3ah5k$1@dont-email.me> <78dd6343-70f6-2c62-4b62-625fe5beca8d@example.net> <vi4ii2$3fdeq$1@dont-email.me> <e59c99f7-19f6-2ddd-7d44-c1e8226dbefe@example.net> <vi5gnt$3kpgd$1@dont-email.me> <ba768dce-f2a6-d324-879c-1a14fd46f554@example.net>
Reply-To: JAB <here@is.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:50:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a19078ba70913d093a3122fc68479023";
	logging-data="108347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hRaAyLB+BAEJd5ookMjJC"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lCoElRGW5HH/+j3s0ynEN+S5+4c=
Bytes: 2677

On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:29:58 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>I'm not talking Musk. I'm saying that california does not care about the 
>planet by excluding Musk.

>>> so clearly supporting other companies is more important than
>>> actually saving the planet.

Like I said, Musk benefited....and now, he does not want other OEMs to
have it.  Foreign OEMs are not allowed this advantage.

Excluding a fat Musk is good for others, and provides incentives for
these others to produce their EVs.  Musk wants a toe-hold on EVs, and
would prefer to corner this market....limited competition then, which
is not good for consumers.

Keep in mind, imports from China get taxed (tariff)...they are much
cheaper.
=====================


In May 2024, the United States increased tariffs on Chinese-made EVs
from 25% to 100%, this follows its longstanding concern about China's
'unfair trade practices.' In July this year, the European Union
imposed a provisional anti-subsidy tariff of up to 37.6% on EVs
imported from China. This comes after an anti-subsidy investigation
launched by the European Commission in October 2023 without a petition
by domestic EV producers. In August, Canada followed suit increasing
its 6.1% import tariff on Chinese EVs to 100%, also citing well-known
issues relating to Chinese industrial policies and subsidies, which
cause overcapacity and unfair competition.

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/09/major-economies-are-taking-aim-at-china-s-ev-industry-here-s-what-to-know/