Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vi7ikf$39pr$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: JAB <here@is.invalid> Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss Subject: Re: $7,500 credit for EV vehicles Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:50:28 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: <vi7ikf$39pr$1@dont-email.me> References: <vi3imp$3ah5k$1@dont-email.me> <78dd6343-70f6-2c62-4b62-625fe5beca8d@example.net> <vi4ii2$3fdeq$1@dont-email.me> <e59c99f7-19f6-2ddd-7d44-c1e8226dbefe@example.net> <vi5gnt$3kpgd$1@dont-email.me> <ba768dce-f2a6-d324-879c-1a14fd46f554@example.net> Reply-To: JAB <here@is.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:50:24 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a19078ba70913d093a3122fc68479023"; logging-data="108347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hRaAyLB+BAEJd5ookMjJC" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:lCoElRGW5HH/+j3s0ynEN+S5+4c= Bytes: 2677 On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:29:58 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >I'm not talking Musk. I'm saying that california does not care about the >planet by excluding Musk. >>> so clearly supporting other companies is more important than >>> actually saving the planet. Like I said, Musk benefited....and now, he does not want other OEMs to have it. Foreign OEMs are not allowed this advantage. Excluding a fat Musk is good for others, and provides incentives for these others to produce their EVs. Musk wants a toe-hold on EVs, and would prefer to corner this market....limited competition then, which is not good for consumers. Keep in mind, imports from China get taxed (tariff)...they are much cheaper. ===================== In May 2024, the United States increased tariffs on Chinese-made EVs from 25% to 100%, this follows its longstanding concern about China's 'unfair trade practices.' In July this year, the European Union imposed a provisional anti-subsidy tariff of up to 37.6% on EVs imported from China. This comes after an anti-subsidy investigation launched by the European Commission in October 2023 without a petition by domestic EV producers. In August, Canada followed suit increasing its 6.1% import tariff on Chinese EVs to 100%, also citing well-known issues relating to Chinese industrial policies and subsidies, which cause overcapacity and unfair competition. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/09/major-economies-are-taking-aim-at-china-s-ev-industry-here-s-what-to-know/