Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:36:09 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vi7vrp$5hv5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <0d6d06a888e15ed2042aca8ec7e6ebb93590b7bc@i2pn2.org>
 <vhtgec$1rdku$3@dont-email.me>
 <8a2aedd8383a84ceef2fd985ac0bf529e2a0eccf@i2pn2.org>
 <vhuv94$25ro0$1@dont-email.me>
 <be7b74a5d83b8ceebd1ec380bb57ff4190ec0cae@i2pn2.org>
 <vhv61v$25uqa$5@dont-email.me>
 <b75deca6b1a0631255cf1402ee83db2b266edd22@i2pn2.org>
 <vhvnvc$2aq7k$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe6ef31f562e0ddf598de46cf864986ca909687@i2pn2.org>
 <vi1pul$2n5v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <9cb8aec671200bb6d71582fd607b876b7ec4c83a@i2pn2.org>
 <vi43br$3cllo$3@dont-email.me> <vi4ak0$3e1nc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4b5d$3dq30$1@dont-email.me>
 <40292abc147fee5a7bdd264b69d34ddf2061e59d@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4upt$3hg8t$1@dont-email.me>
 <c43fe07653eac2a9cc0432a6e289bfa1307613f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vi6rau$3v0dn$1@dont-email.me>
 <0bc3cdc8c096bba16decd94ad2af85d35da9b7b4@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7jv2$377e$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd3b1465f1afb40960f5969b583b179a26291d6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7r4m$g2n7$1@solani.org> <vi7ve3$5fnv$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:36:10 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58239a7b3a020d2732b6b155de2bdfee";
	logging-data="182245"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Uuqq13VMYDOJPM3SA9DFi"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OrymLjVEYMSecFK5qlTcb8VWUZw=
In-Reply-To: <vi7ve3$5fnv$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2854

Am 27.11.2024 um 21:28 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> On 11/27/2024 11:15 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 27.11.2024 18:58, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 11/27/24 12:13 PM, WM wrote:
>>
>>>> Replacing every element of the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} by its 
>>>> successor yields {1, 2, 3, ..., ω}.

Holy shit!

Nein, Mückenheim!

     {n' : n e IN u {0}} = IN

und bekanntlich ist ω nicht e IN u {0} also auch nicht e IN. <facepalm>

Du bist wirklich dümmer als die Polizei erlaubt!

Hinweis: ~En e IN u {0}: n' = ω.

>>> Nope, [...] the successor of EVERY natural number is a natural number
>>> [hence] omega is NOT the successor for any natural number

Jep. Indeed!

>> The successor of the last natural number is ω.

Mückenheim, geh doch endlich mal zu einem Psychiater!

> There is no last natural number you fucking dipshit!

Yeah.