Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vi80l0$5eol$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on
 Texting
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:49:36 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vi80l0$5eol$5@dont-email.me>
References: <uonckjdcje9bb6h3ajb0um6edmvl3lkt9i@4ax.com>
 <vi6fv8$3ta2v$1@dont-email.me> <1n7ekj95lf13of85pgfh46fd73b063uq5s@4ax.com>
 <vi7v3j$5hcn$1@dont-email.me> <k71fkj94mn2r7qutpom47ha4bb6hieg7oh@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 21:49:37 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d84ecfb56ab832cc2791798ba52a1095";
	logging-data="178965"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zECJ5hz3u/r6COSIcB1a7e7fq13hsJws="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+DQYCY3ySisODlU/8+EfTamCNvk=
In-Reply-To: <k71fkj94mn2r7qutpom47ha4bb6hieg7oh@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 2341

On 2024-11-27 12:46, Joel wrote:
> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-11-27 13:31:05 +0000, Joel said:
>>> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-27 00:15:06 +0000, Joel said:
>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And it had how much storage, again?  Heh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You imagine that as some great "gotcha", do you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it is, because it's where Apple rips people off.  Why is 256 GB
>>>>> still the basic option?  In almost 2025?  Retarded.
>>>>
>>>> Because you obviously don't understand Apple's CPUs and / or stuck in
>>>> the same old MHz-myth style nonsense that caused Apple to swap to Intel
>>>> CPU years ago. Apple's chips simply don't actually need as much RAM as
>>>> Intel CISC CPUs do.
>>>
>>> The 256 GB is storage, not RAM, and why would RISC need *less* RAM?
>>> You're talking out of your ass, apparently.
>>
>> Another moron troll for the killfile.  :-\
> 
> 
> Another moron Apple dumbshit to killfile me so he doesn't have to
> learn the truth.
> 

Seriously: how old are you?