Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vi9chq$fjo6$8@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:18:50 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vi9chq$fjo6$8@dont-email.me>
References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me> <vhsdhp$1m6qu$2@dont-email.me>
 <X4KcnQQzFNko49_6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vhvdmo$2900d$3@dont-email.me> <vhvdqu$28p7r$7@dont-email.me>
 <vhvm34$2aerk$2@dont-email.me>
 <1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net>
 <lqi4odFdu06U3@mid.individual.net>
 <77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net>
 <vi1p3r$2oh05$7@dont-email.me>
 <2118139f-4451-560b-5094-a3d61c05f0d3@example.net>
 <lqkh38Fpp09U2@mid.individual.net> <vi47lr$3cj2g$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4hok$3f6em$1@dont-email.me> <lqmk0jF5lsrU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vi71hb$3vogk$10@dont-email.me> <lqp98rFin9jU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:18:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="324bccc9bb11dd88d68685d631659c8b";
	logging-data="511750"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tUlmrF9/+Cytg7EDH257JBW28I6+HFuQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OON75oQf8i1SccITvmySw48Og7s=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <lqp98rFin9jU2@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 2607

On 27/11/2024 19:12, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:58:35 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> I've encountered that in my time in mil spec aerospace.
>> A very few people analysed the project and broke it down in to circuit
>> board specs.
> 
> I worked on one DoD project in my career. I got bored and wandered off
> after 6 months of wrangling about the spec. About a year later I talked to
> one of the programmers who had stayed and asked if they'd written any code
> yet. "Nope."
> 
> So much blood, sweat, tears, and ego involvement is involved in specs like
> that it will be implemented even if it becomes apparent it isn't going to
> work. Fiascos like the F-35 don't surprise me at all.

The amazing thing was that random monkeys did in the end through a 
process of iteration 'hit upon the right thing, after exhausting every 
other alternative'



-- 
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and 
wrong.

H.L.Mencken