Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:14:10 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vi9fpi$g1of$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vhtgec$1rdku$3@dont-email.me>
 <8a2aedd8383a84ceef2fd985ac0bf529e2a0eccf@i2pn2.org>
 <vhuv94$25ro0$1@dont-email.me>
 <be7b74a5d83b8ceebd1ec380bb57ff4190ec0cae@i2pn2.org>
 <vhv61v$25uqa$5@dont-email.me>
 <b75deca6b1a0631255cf1402ee83db2b266edd22@i2pn2.org>
 <vhvnvc$2aq7k$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe6ef31f562e0ddf598de46cf864986ca909687@i2pn2.org>
 <vi1pul$2n5v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <9cb8aec671200bb6d71582fd607b876b7ec4c83a@i2pn2.org>
 <vi43br$3cllo$3@dont-email.me> <vi4ak0$3e1nc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4b5d$3dq30$1@dont-email.me>
 <40292abc147fee5a7bdd264b69d34ddf2061e59d@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4upt$3hg8t$1@dont-email.me>
 <c43fe07653eac2a9cc0432a6e289bfa1307613f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vi6rau$3v0dn$1@dont-email.me>
 <0bc3cdc8c096bba16decd94ad2af85d35da9b7b4@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7jv2$377e$1@dont-email.me> <9896cb31-806b-40a2-a03e-dc4aea744d04@att.net>
 <298a18e0-a0c6-4db2-901d-da255ecace0b@tha.de>
 <98d5429fe188b6924989872490403bb86f7afdfc@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:14:10 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="67cce382144bf1df261eb72066b481f0";
	logging-data="526095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LwvCP2bNzKkm6VS9f2lgrazWpCArVSJc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q403tPPiNYlWtRc6nHRgIDWVzLs=
In-Reply-To: <98d5429fe188b6924989872490403bb86f7afdfc@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2644

On 28.11.2024 01:31, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/27/24 4:33 PM, WM wrote:
>> On 27.11.2024 20:47, Jim Burns wrote:
>>
>>> Finite cardinals can change by 1
>>> The cardinal |ℕᶠⁱⁿ| cannot change by 1
>>
>> Small wonder. Fuzzy properties like "many" cannot change by 1.
>>>
>>> Yes,
>>> the sets can change membership by 1
>>
>>> However,
>>> the cardinalities of those sets cannot change by 1
>>
>> This proves that cardinality is a fuzzy property.

> No, it shows that infinite values act differently than finite numbers.

They do not act but are described. Blind men use fuzzy measured, seeing 
men use precise measures.

Regards, WM