| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<viaf6s$lakg$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Up to 1 in 7 research papers fabricated?
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 13:10:20 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <viaf6s$lakg$3@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
logging-data="81321"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xPc3FverQewcVUOVJfrRyi+A7Cs=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
id EC74C229782; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:10:28 -0500 (EST)
by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69C6229765
for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:10:26 -0500 (EST)
by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.98)
for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3)
tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
(envelope-from <news@eternal-september.org>)
id 1tGjuC-000000009Pi-1yn0; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:10:24 +0100
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C21D5F8E1
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:10:22 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/4C21D5F8E1; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
id 88D6FDC01A9; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:10:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:10:21 +0100 (CET)
Content-Language: en-US
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+R+7saWeW+TIRqxJHw4/muJ8xwQnaOojk=
FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6
smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 3129
https://www.science.org/content/article/systematic-reviews-aim-extract-broad-conclusions-many-studies-are-peril
A researcher wanted to do a meta review evaluation of his research
interest and came up with hundreds of papers when he only expected
around 60. Most of them were likely fabricated from paper mills. This
sounds pretty sad.
The ID perps almost never publish their junk in real journals, but it
sounds like there are a lot of journals out there that would be happy to
publish the IDiotic junk.
Ron Okimoto