Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vib878$pqul$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: What is an N-bit machine?
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 02:17:13 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vib878$pqul$1@dont-email.me>
References: <viao3r$na9e$4@dont-email.me>
	<memo.20241128220827.12904a@jgd.cix.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:17:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ddfccfbf5a3062a4cb3831fbe9a8aca";
	logging-data="846805"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18gJ6gqURhSB1iW/G4Pq8RE"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mz1ELfZl/O5CNH+A2CKmQ9lY9U0=
Bytes: 2263

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:08 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), John Dallman wrote:

> In article <viao3r$na9e$4@dont-email.me>, ldo@nz.invalid (Lawrence
> D'Oliveiro) wrote:
> 
>> Apple went through the same sort of thing. Yet it managed the 
>> transition much more cleanly.
> 
> Apple simply demanded all software become 32-bit clean. The fact that
> they didn't forsee the problem and warn software writers not to use the
> high 8 bits rather implies they weren't paying attention. 

Oh, they were paying attention, all right. In the original 1984 Macintosh 
software, the top 8 bits in a “handle” (pointer to a pointer to a 
relocatable block) were used to store handle state (e.g. whether the block 
was locked in a particular memory location). But there were no API calls 
to save/restore this state. That was fixed in the Mac Plus in 1986. So all 
had to happen was for app developers to use the new calls, instead of 
peeking at bits directly.

>> This in spite of having an installed base that was orders of 
>> magnitude larger than the IBM System/360 family.
> 
> Apples and oranges. IBM had fewer but much larger customer
> organisations, and could not afford to upset them much.

IBM had legendary market power, all the way up to monopoly status. 
Whatever it decreed, its market had to follow.